Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28264480›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Study Approach of Antioxidant Properties in Foods: Update and Considerations.

Alessandra Durazzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Saponins fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Agarwood-The Fragrant Molecules of a Wounded Tree.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Elucidating the Neuroprotective Effect ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Anti-Obesity Effect ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alessandra DurazzoConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria, Centro di Ricerca CREA-Alimenti e Nutrizione, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Roma, Italy. alessandra.durazzo@crea.gov.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The assessment of interactions between natural antioxidants and other food matrix components represents the main step in the investigation of total antioxidant properties, in terms of potential health benefits. The diversity of chemical structures of natural compounds, besides their possible interactions, as well as the biological role and different modes of action makes it difficult to assess a single and reliable procedure for the evaluation of antioxidant activity. Today, much attention is given to the distinction between extractable and non-extractable antioxidants as a key tool in the description of the nutritional and healthy properties of food matrices. The starting point for the investigation of antioxidant effects of food extracts is the analysis of antioxidant properties of pure compounds and their interactions. Another complementary approach could be represented by the study of how different biologically active compound-rich extracts contribute to the total antioxidant capacity.

Indexed as

antioxidant propertiesbiologically active fractionsextractable compoundsnon-extractable compoundspure compoundsstudy approach

Identifiers

PMID28264480
PMCPMC5368536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.