Trial reportJournal of diabetes science and technology2017
The First Use of Bolus Calculator With Speech Analyzer.
Trial report in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- App-Based Insulin Calculators: Current and Future State.Current diabetes reports · 2018Review
- Accuracy of Automatic Carbohydrate, Protein, Fat and Calorie Counting Based on Voice Descriptions of Meals in People with Type 1 Diabetes.Nutrients · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes involves a wide array of restrictions in patients and their families. One of those is a difficulty in estimation of the insulin dose programmed for each meal. The purpose of the study is an assessment of functionalities related to the expert system VoiceDiab-a calculator of meal boluses.
methodsThe sample group composed of 54 patients, aged 3-52, all suffering from type 1 diabetes, treated with the insulin pump, taking part in the clinics RCT (for adults and a pediatrician), with a randomized allocation to a surveyed group and cross-over. The research methodology was based upon questionnaires and open-ended questions.
results40% of respondents recognized the application's usefulness as high (18 of 47), giving it 10 points, and easy to use (70%). Disadvantages of this app comprised lack of some products in the application database (n = 23), troubles with the mobile range ( n = 4), and no option of a manual data input for processing purposes (n = 23). Advantages, that have been mentioned the most frequently included facilitation of measurements (n = 7), enhanced life quality of the patient (n = 8), and a guarantee of prompt and thorough calculations (n = 22). Of the surveyed individuals, 50% reached their diet, while 100% gave a top grade to the application, claiming it had contributed to a more efficient metabolic control.
conclusionThe pilot scheme of the expert system VoiceDiab has potential to become an application, facilitating dosing of the meal insulin and improving the comfort and safety of insulin administering. However, it needs to be modified, as mentioned by the users who have tested the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.