Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28264002›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

A simulation study to evaluate the performance of five statistical monitoring methods when applied to different time-series components in the context of control programs for endemic diseases.

Ana Carolina Lopes Antunes, Dan Jensen, Tariq Halasa, Nils Toft

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Accuracy of State-Level Surveillance during Emerging Outbreaks of Respiratory Viruses: A Model-Based Assessment.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Carolina Lopes AntunesDivision for Diagnostics and Scientific Advice-Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute-DTU, Bülowsvej 27, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8142-8241
Dan JensenSection for Production and Health, Department of Large Animal Science-KU, Grønnegårdsvej 8, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Tariq HalasaDivision for Diagnostics and Scientific Advice-Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute-DTU, Bülowsvej 27, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Nils ToftDivision for Diagnostics and Scientific Advice-Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute-DTU, Bülowsvej 27, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Copenhagen Business School · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disease monitoring and surveillance play a crucial role in control and eradication programs, as it is important to track implemented strategies in order to reduce and/or eliminate a specific disease. The objectives of this study were to assess the performance of different statistical monitoring methods for endemic disease control program scenarios, and to explore what impact of variation (noise) in the data had on the performance of these monitoring methods. We simulated 16 different scenarios of changes in weekly sero-prevalence. The changes included different combinations of increases, decreases and constant sero-prevalence levels (referred as events). Two space-state models were used to model the time series, and different statistical monitoring methods (such as univariate process control algorithms-Shewart Control Chart, Tabular Cumulative Sums, and the V-mask- and monitoring of the trend component-based on 99% confidence intervals and the trend sign) were tested. Performance was evaluated based on the number of iterations in which an alarm was raised for a given week after the changes were introduced. Results revealed that the Shewhart Control Chart was better at detecting increases over decreases in sero-prevalence, whereas the opposite was observed for the Tabular Cumulative Sums. The trend-based methods detected the first event well, but performance was poorer when adapting to several consecutive events. The V-Mask method seemed to perform most consistently, and the impact of noise in the baseline was greater for the Shewhart Control Chart and Tabular Cumulative Sums than for the V-Mask and trend-based methods. The performance of the different statistical monitoring methods varied when monitoring increases and decreases in disease sero-prevalence. Combining two of more methods might improve the potential scope of surveillance systems, allowing them to fulfill different objectives due to their complementary advantages.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsAnimalsDatabases, FactualEndemic DiseasesReproducibility of ResultsSwineSwine Diseases

Identifiers

PMID28264002
PMCPMC5338814
OpenAlexW2593676962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.