Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28263920›Full record

ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2017

Healthcare Costs and Utilization for Patients Age 50 to 64 Years with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treated with Chemotherapy or with Chemotherapy and Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Jaime M Preussler, Christa L Meyer, Lih-Wen Mau, Navneet S Majhail, Ellen M Denzen, Kristen C Edsall, Stephanie H Farnia, Wael Saber, Linda J Burns, David J Vanness

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jaime M PreusslerNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Christa L MeyerNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Lih-Wen MauNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Navneet S MajhailBlood & Marrow Transplant Program, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Ellen M DenzenNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kristen C EdsallNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Stephanie H FarniaNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Wael SaberCenter for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Linda J BurnsNational Marrow Donor Program/Be The Match, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David J VannessDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin. Electronic address: dvanness@wisc.edu.

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
PB vs. BMU01HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2001 to 2010
$63.3M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to describe healthcare costs and utilization during the first year after a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for privately insured non-Medicare patients in the United States aged 50 to 64 years who were treated with either chemotherapy or chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). MarketScan (Truven Health Analytics) adjudicated total payments for inpatient, outpatient, and prescription drug claims from 2007 to 2011 were used to estimate costs from the health system perspective. Stabilized inverse propensity score weights were constructed using logistic regression to account for differential selection of alloHCT over chemotherapy. Weighted generalized linear models adjusted costs and utilization (hospitalizations, inpatient days, and outpatient visit-days) for differences in age, sex, diagnosis year, region, insurance plan type, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index), and 60-day prediagnosis costs. Because mortality data were not available, models could not be adjusted for survival times. Among 29,915 patients with a primary diagnosis of AML, 985 patients met inclusion criteria (774 [79%] receiving chemotherapy alone and 211 [21%] alloHCT). Adjusted mean 1-year costs were $280,788 for chemotherapy and $544,178 for alloHCT. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone had a mean of 4 hospitalizations, 52.9 inpatient days, and 52.4 outpatient visits in the year after AML diagnosis; patients receiving alloHCT had 5 hospitalizations, 92.5 inpatient days, and 74.5 outpatient visits. Treating AML in the first year after diagnosis incurs substantial healthcare costs and utilization with chemotherapy alone and with alloHCT. Our analysis informs healthcare providers, policymakers, and payers so they can better understand treatment costs and utilization for privately insured patients aged 50 to 64 with AML.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsDelivery of Health CareDrug TherapyFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInsurance, HealthLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedModels, EconomicTransplantation, HomologousUnited StatesAcute myeloid leukemiaClaims dataCost analysisHematopoietic cell transplantationResource utilization

Identifiers

PMID28263920
PMCPMC5497312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.