Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28263205›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of surgery2018

Long-term Follow-up of MEN1 Patients Who Do Not Have Initial Surgery for Small ≤2 cm Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, an AFCE and GTE Study: Association Francophone de Chirurgie Endocrinienne & Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Endocrines.

Frederic Triponez, Samira M Sadowski, François Pattou, Catherine Cardot-Bauters, Eric Mirallié, Maëlle Le Bras, Frédéric Sebag, Patricia Niccoli, Sophie Deguelte, Guillaume Cadiot and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement on Management of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.

Frederic TriponezDepartment of Thoracic and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Samira M SadowskiDepartment of Thoracic and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospitals of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
François PattouDepartment of General and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France.
Catherine Cardot-BautersDepartment of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Lille, Lille, France.
Eric MiralliéDepartment of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Maëlle Le BrasDepartment of Endocrinology, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Frédéric SebagDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, La Conception University Hospital, Marseille, France.
Patricia NiccoliInstitut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Sophie DeguelteDepartment of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Guillaume CadiotDepartment of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France.
Gilles PoncetDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean-Christophe LifanteDepartment of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Lyon Sud and 2/EA 7425 HESPER, Health Services and Performance Research, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Françoise Borson-ChazotDepartment of Endocrinology, Hospital Louis Pradel, University Lyon I, Lyon, France.
Philippe ChaffanjonDepartment of Thoracic, Vascular and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Olivier ChabreDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetology, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Fabrice MenegauxDepartment of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital La Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France.
Eric BaudinDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris Sud, Villejuif, France.
Philippe RuszniewskiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, Beaujon Hospital, University Paris 7, Clichy, France.
Hélène Du BoullayDepartment of Endocrinology, General Hospital of Chambéry, Chambéry, France.
Pierre GoudetDepartment of Endocrine Surgery, University Hospital of Dijon, and INSERM, U866, Epidemiology and Clinical Research in Digestive Oncology Team, and INSERM, CIC1432, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, University Hospital of Dijon, Clinical Investigation Center, Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trials Unit, Dijon, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHCentre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims · FRHôpital de la Conception · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRLille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRMaison des Sciences de l’Homme de Dijon · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FRUniversité de Reims Champagne-Ardenne · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report long-term follow-up of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PET).

backgroundPancreaticoduodenal tumors occur in almost all patients with MEN1 and are a major cause of death. The natural history and clinical outcome are poorly defined, and management is still controversial for small NF-PET.

methodsClinical outcome and tumor progression were analyzed in 46 patients with MEN1 with 2 cm or smaller NF-PET who did not have surgery at the time of initial diagnosis. Survival data were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

resultsForty-six patients with MEN1 were followed prospectively for 10.7 ± 4.2 (mean ± standard deviation) years. One patient was lost to follow-up and 1 died from a cause unrelated to MEN1. Twenty-eight patients had stable disease and 16 showed significant progression of pancreaticoduodenal involvement, indicated by increase in size or number of tumors, development of a hypersecretion syndrome, need for surgery (7 patients), and death from metastatic NF-PET (1 patient). The mean event-free survival was 13.9 ± 1.1 years after NF-PET diagnosis. At last follow-up, none of the living patients who had undergone surgery or follow-up had evidence of metastases on imaging studies.

conclusionsOur study shows that conservative management for patients with MEN1 with NF-PET of 2 cm or smaller is associated with a low risk of disease-specific mortality. The decision to recommend surgery to prevent tumor spread should be balanced with operative mortality and morbidity, and patients should be informed about the risk-benefit ratio of conservative versus aggressive management when the NF-PET represents an intermediate risk.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentAdultClinical Decision-MakingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Pancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28263205
PMCPMC6012055
OpenAlexW2593897977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.