Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28263169›Full record

ReviewBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2017

Unraveling the Gordian knot: red blood cell storage lesion and transfusion outcomes.

Vassilis L Tzounakas, Anastasios G Kriebardis, Jerard Seghatchian, Issidora S Papassideri, Marianna H Antonelou

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Red blood cell transfusion policy: a critical literature review.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2017
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vassilis L TzounakasDepartment of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), School of Sciences, Athens, Greece.
Anastasios G KriebardisDepartment of Medical Laboratories, Faculty of Health and Caring Professions, Technological and Educational Institute of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Jerard SeghatchianInternational Consultancy in Blood Component Quality/Safety Improvement, Audit/Inspection and DDR Strategy, London, United Kingdom.
Issidora S PapassideriDepartment of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), School of Sciences, Athens, Greece.
Marianna H AntonelouDepartment of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), School of Sciences, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What is following the impressive progress that has been made? During the last couple of years several tremors have shaken the field of Transfusion Medicine. The epicentres of those tremors were located on novel insights into the RBC storage lesion, on emerging connections between storage lesion and post-transfusion performance and effects, and on acknowledging that storage time is only one (rather than the most prominent) of the parameters which contribute to the progression of storage lesion in any given unit of blood. The optimisation of bio-preservation conditions emerged at the same time with all-new scientific knowledge gained by advances in research tools, implementation of technological innovations, and application of elegant in vitro and in vivo models of transfusion. Simultaneously, one after another, all the reported randomised clinical trials concluded, with spectacular consensus, that there is no significant difference in the rate of adverse clinical events (including death) among patients who underwent transfusion with fresh (and presumably good) or standard of care (and presumably bad) blood. The comparative analysis and comprehension of the aforementioned data would set the context for the next generation of research in blood transfusion science, since the need for safer and more efficient transfusions remains.

Indexed as

Blood PreservationErythrocyte TransfusionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28263169
PMCPMC5336333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.