ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2017
Neurodevelopmental changes across adolescence in viewing and labeling dynamic peer emotions.
Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stress Reduction in Perioperative Care: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Depressive Symptoms Are Associated With Altered Development of Amygdala-Ventrolateral Prefrontal Connectivity During Implicit Emotion Regulation Across Adolescence.Biological psychiatry · 2026Article
- The Cognitive-Affective Social Processing and Emotion Regulation (CASPER) model.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Timing of Violence Exposure and Girls' Temperament Stability From Childhood to Adolescence.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2023Article
- The functioning of adolescents during quarantine - the role of non-professional and professional support in overcoming the problem of social isolation.Postepy psychiatrii neurologii · 2021Review
- Improving practices and inferences in developmental cognitive neuroscience.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020Review
- Levers and barriers to success in the use of translational neuroscience for the prevention and treatment of mental health and promotion of well-being across the lifespan.Journal of abnormal psychology · 2020Article
- Affective reactivity during adolescence: Associations with age, puberty and testosterone.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019Article
- Is adolescence the missing developmental link in Microbiome-Gut-Brain axis communication?Developmental psychobiology · 2019Review
- Social perspective taking is associated with self-reported prosocial behavior and regional cortical thickness across adolescence.Developmental psychology · 2018Article
- Moderate social sensitivity in a risky context supports adaptive decision making in adolescence: evidence from brain and behavior.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2018Article
- Not just social sensitivity: Adolescent neural suppression of social feedback during risk taking.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2018Article
- Prefrontal Cortical Response to Negative Social Words Links Social Risk to Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2020
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adolescence is a sensitive period of social-affective development, characterized by biological, neurological, and social changes. The field currently conceptualizes these changes in terms of an imbalance between systems supporting reactivity and regulation, specifically nonlinear changes in reactivity networks and linear changes in regulatory networks. Previous research suggests that the labeling or reappraisal of emotion increases activity in lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC), and decreases activity in amygdala relative to passive viewing of affective stimuli. However, past work in this area has relied heavily on paradigms using static, adult faces, as well as explicit regulation. In the current study, we assessed cross-sectional trends in neural responses to viewing and labeling dynamic peer emotional expressions in adolescent girls 10-23 years old. Our dynamic adolescent stimuli set reliably and robustly recruited key brain regions involved in emotion reactivity (medial orbital frontal cortex/ventral medial prefrontal cortex; MOFC/vMPFC, bilateral amygdala) and regulation (bilateral dorsal and ventral LPFC). However, contrary to the age-trends predicted by the dominant models in studies of risk/reward, the LPFC showed a nonlinear age trend across adolescence to labeling dynamic peer faces, whereas the MOFC/vMPFC showed a linear decrease with age to viewing dynamic peer faces. There were no significant age trends observed in the amygdala.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.