Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261746›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2017

Bone resorptive activity in symptomatic and asymptomatic apical lesions of endodontic origin.

M Salinas-Muñoz, M Garrido-Flores, M Baeza, P Huamán-Chipana, J García-Sesnich, R Bologna, R Vernal, M Hernández

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M Salinas-MuñozLaboratory of Periodontal Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
M Garrido-FloresLaboratory of Periodontal Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
M BaezaLaboratory of Periodontal Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
P Huamán-ChipanaLaboratory of Periodontal Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
J García-SesnichLaboratory of Periodontal Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
R BolognaMolecular Pathology Area, School of Dentistry, Universidad de la República UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay.
R VernalLaboratory of Periodontal Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
M HernándezLaboratory of Periodontal Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile. mhernandezrios@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8289-7314
University of Chile · CLUniversidad Autónoma de Chile · CLUniversidad de la República de Uruguay · UY

Funding

FONDECYT 1120138 and 1160741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to assess the levels and diagnostic accuracy of a set of bone resorption biomarkers, including TRAP-5, RANKL, and OPG in symptomatic and asymptomatic apical lesions and controls. MATERIALS AND

methodsApical tissues from symptomatic and asymptomatic apical periodontitis patients and periodontal ligaments from healthy teeth extracted for orthodontic reasons were processed for tissue homogenization and the levels of TRAP-5, RANKL, and OPG were determined by multiplex assay. Marker levels were analyzed by Kruskal Wallis test, and diagnostic accuracy was analyzed with ROC curves.

resultsHigher levels of RANKL, OPG, and RANKL/OPG ratio were determined in both types of apical lesions compared to healthy periodontal ligament, whereas higher TRAP-5 levels were found only in symptomatic apical lesions (p < 0.05). OPG, RANKL, and RANKL/OPG ratio showed diagnostic potential to identify apical lesions versus healthy controls (AUC = 0.69, p < 0.05); while TRAP-5 showed a potential to discriminate symptomatic versus asymptomatic apical periodontitis (AUC = 0.71, p < 0.05) and healthy controls (AUC = 0.83, p < 0.05).

conclusionsApical lesions showed higher RANKL and OPG levels than healthy tissues. TRAP-5 levels were the highest in symptomatic apical lesions, suggesting that these represent a progressive state, and showed diagnostic potential. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinically symptomatic apical periodontitis might represent biologically progressive apical lesions based on TRAP5 levels. TRAP5 has diagnostic potential to identify these lesions, representing a candidate prognostic biomarker.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiomarkersBone ResorptionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOsteoprotegerinPeriapical PeriodontitisPeriodontal LigamentRANK LigandTartrate-Resistant Acid PhosphataseACP5 protein, humanBiomarkersOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandTartrate-Resistant Acid PhosphataseAsymptomatic periapical periodontitisBiomarkersBone resorptionOPGRANKLSymptomaticTRAP

Identifiers

PMID28261746
PMCPMC5632344
OpenAlexW2591725302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.