Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261689›Full record

ArticleACS omega2017

Assessing the Ability of Spectroscopic Methods to Determine the Difference in the Folding Propensities of Highly Similar β-Hairpins.

Hanna Andersson, Emma Danelius, Patrik Jarvoll, Stephan Niebling, Ashley J Hughes, Sebastian Westenhoff, Ulrika Brath, Máté Erdélyi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Going Viral: An Investigation into the Chameleonic Behaviour of Antiviral Compounds.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  3. Hydrocarbon Macrocycle Conformer Ensembles andAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  4. Pushing the Limits of Characterising a Weak Halogen Bond in Solution.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanna AnderssonDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg , Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Emma DaneliusDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg , Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Patrik JarvollDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg , Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Stephan NieblingDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg , Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ashley J HughesDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg , Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sebastian WestenhoffDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg , Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ulrika BrathDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg , Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Máté ErdélyiDepartment of Chemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Gothenburg, Kemivägen 10, SE-412 96 Gothenburg, Sweden; The Swedish NMR Centre, Medicinaregatan 5c, SE-413 96 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

European Research Council 259638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have evaluated the ability of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopies to describe the difference in the folding propensities of two structurally highly similar cyclic β-hairpins, comparing the outcome to that of molecular dynamics simulations. NAMFIS-type NMR ensemble analysis and CD spectroscopy were observed to accurately describe the consequence of altering a single interaction site, whereas a single-site

Identifiers

PMID28261689
PMCPMC5331454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.