Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261664›Full record

ArticleNeotropical biodiversity2017

Revisiting adaptations of neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) to gleaning bat predation.

Hannah Ter Hofstede, Silke Voigt-Heucke, Alexander Lang, Heinrich Römer, Rachel Page, Paul Faure, Dina Dechmann

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical biodiversity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hearing sensitivity: An underlying mechanism for niche differentiation in gleaning bats.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Hannah Ter HofstedeDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College , Hanover , NH , USA.
Silke Voigt-HeuckeDepartment of Biology, Chemistry, and Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin , Berlin , Germany.
Alexander LangZoology Institute, University of Graz , Graz , Austria.
Heinrich RömerZoology Institute, University of Graz , Graz , Austria.
Rachel PageSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute , Ancon , Panama.
Paul FaureDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada.
Dina DechmannDepartment of Biology, Universitat Konstanz , Konstanz , Germany.
University of Graz · ATDartmouth College · USFreie Universität Berlin · DEMcMaster University · CASmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAUniversity of Konstanz · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All animals have defenses against predators, but assessing the effectiveness of such traits is challenging. Neotropical katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) are an abundant, ubiquitous, and diverse group of large insects eaten by a variety of predators, including substrate-gleaning bats. Gleaning bats capture food from surfaces and usually use prey-generated sounds to detect and locate prey. A number of Neotropical katydid signaling traits, such as the emission of ultrasonic frequencies, substrate vibration communication, infrequent calling, and ultrasound-evoked song cessation are thought to have evolved as defenses against substrate-gleaning bats. We collected insect remains from hairy big-eared bat (

Indexed as

anti-predator defensesChiropteraeavesdroppingPanamapredator-prey arms race

Identifiers

PMID28261664
PMCPMC5312797
OpenAlexW2581037818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.