Team-Based Coaching Approach to Peer Review: Sharing Service and Scholarship.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The importance of peer review skills: Value and necessity of training residents to ensure continued scientific excellence.AEM education and training · 2024
   Article
2. The Inside Scoop: What We Learnt About Getting into Academic Publishing During Our Editorial Internship.Medical science educator · 2024
   Article
3. A guide to peer reviewing medical education scholarship: Advice from editors ofAEM education and training · 2021
   Article
4. Envisioning the Future of Academic Writing.Journal of graduate medical education · 2020
   Article
5. A Toolkit for Medical Education Scholarship.Journal of graduate medical education · 2018
   Article
6. Developing Your Expertise as a Peer Reviewer.Journal of graduate medical education · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as