Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261279›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2017

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recommendations of Turkish multidisciplinary neuroendocrine tumor study group on diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Suayib Yalcin, Fahri Bayram, Sibel Erdamar, Ozlem Kucuk, Nevin Oruc, Ahmet Coker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Estimation of Health-Related Utilities forPharmacoEconomics - open · 2021
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Lanreotide vs octreotide LAR for patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: An observational time and motion analysis.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2019
    Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suayib YalcinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Institute of Cancer, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Fahri BayramDepartment of Endocrinology, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Sibel ErdamarDepartment of Pathology, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ozlem KucukDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Nevin OrucDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.
Ahmet CokerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) are a relatively rare, heterogeneous group of diseases in which important advances have been observed in the diagnosis and treatment as well as in our understanding of the biology and genetics of the disease in recent years. Given the insufficient scientific data available on evidence-based management of GEPNETs and the differences in circumstances in individual countries, a multidisciplinary study group was established to provide guidelines for the management of GEPNETS. This study group consisted of a medical oncologist, endocrinologist, surgeon, pathologist, gastroenterologist, and a nuclear medicine specialist, who aimed to prepare a practical guide in the light of existing scientific data and international guidelines, to be used in common clinical practice.

Indexed as

consensusdiagnosisguidelineneuroendocrine tumortreatment

Identifiers

PMID28261279
PMCPMC5332464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.