Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261241›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Analysis of Plant Pan-Genomes and Transcriptomes with GET_HOMOLOGUES-EST, a Clustering Solution for Sequences of the Same Species.

Bruno Contreras-Moreira, Carlos P Cantalapiedra, María J García-Pereira, Sean P Gordon, John P Vogel, Ernesto Igartua, Ana M Casas, Pablo Vinuesa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Exploring the genetic makeup ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Methods for Pangenomic Core Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bruno Contreras-MoreiraEstación Experimental de Aula Dei - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasZaragoza, Spain; Fundación ARAIDZaragoza, Spain.
Carlos P CantalapiedraEstación Experimental de Aula Dei - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Zaragoza, Spain.
María J García-PereiraEstación Experimental de Aula Dei - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Zaragoza, Spain.
Sean P GordonDOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek CA, USA.
John P VogelDOE Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek CA, USA.
Ernesto IgartuaEstación Experimental de Aula Dei - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Zaragoza, Spain.
Ana M CasasEstación Experimental de Aula Dei - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Zaragoza, Spain.
Pablo VinuesaCentro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pan-genome of a species is defined as the union of all the genes and non-coding sequences found in all its individuals. However, constructing a pan-genome for plants with large genomes is daunting both in sequencing cost and the scale of the required computational analysis. A more affordable alternative is to focus on the genic repertoire by using transcriptomic data. Here, the software GET_HOMOLOGUES-EST was benchmarked with genomic and RNA-seq data of 19

Indexed as

accessory genomeArabidopsis thalianabarleycomparative genomicscore-genomepan-genomeRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID28261241
PMCPMC5306281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.