ReviewFrontiers in plant science2017
Progress in Genome Editing Technology and Its Application in Plants.
Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking gene-edited crop regulation: advancing a Principle-based framework for modern biotechnology governance.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- Evolution of agricultural biotechnology is the paradigm shift in crop resilience and development: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Plant Functional Genomics Based on High-Throughput CRISPR Library Knockout Screening: A Perspective.Advanced genetics (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Genomic view of heavy-ion-induced deletions associated with distribution of essential genes inFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Putting CRISPR-Cas system in action: a golden window for efficient and precise genome editing for crop improvement.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Strategies and Methods for Improving the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Editing in Plant Molecular Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Evolution of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- CRISPR-mediated technology for seed oil improvement in rapeseed: Challenges and future perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- CRISPR-Cas9 based stress tolerance: New hope for abiotic stress tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum).Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- CRISPR-Based Genome Editing: Advancements and Opportunities for Rice Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of the DCL2 and DCL4 genes in Nicotiana benthamiana and its productivity of recombinant proteins.Plant cell reports · 2022Article
- Novel and emerging biotechnological crop protection approaches.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Potato improvement through genetic engineering.GM crops & food · 2021Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 editedPlant signaling & behavior · 2020Article
- Considerations in adapting CRISPR/Cas9 in nongenetic model plant systems.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Review
- Microbial-assisted and genomic-assisted breeding: a two way approach for the improvement of nutritional quality traits in agricultural crops.3 Biotech · 2020Review
- Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing in Witloof (Frontiers in genome editing · 2020Article
- Climatic changes and potatoes: How can we cope with the abiotic stresses?Breeding science · 2019Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome editing technology (GET) is a versatile approach that has progressed rapidly as a mechanism to alter the genotype and phenotype of organisms. However, conventional genome modification using GET cannot satisfy current demand for high-efficiency and site-directed mutagenesis, retrofitting of artificial nucleases has developed into a new avenue within this field. Based on mechanisms to recognize target genes, newly-developed GETs can generally be subdivided into three cleavage systems, protein-dependent DNA cleavage systems (i.e., zinc-finger nucleases, ZFN, and transcription activator-like effector nucleases, TALEN), RNA-dependent DNA cleavage systems (i.e., clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR associated proteins, CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cpf1, and CRISPR-C2c1), and RNA-dependent RNA cleavage systems (i.e., RNA interference, RNAi, and CRISPR-C2c2). All these techniques can lead to double-stranded (DSB) or single-stranded breaks (SSB), and result in either random mutations via non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or targeted mutation via homologous recombination (HR). Thus, site-directed mutagenesis can be induced via targeted gene knock-out, knock-in, or replacement to modify specific characteristics including morphology-modification, resistance-enhancement, and physiological mechanism-improvement along with plant growth and development. In this paper, an non-comprehensive review on the development of different GETs as applied to plants is presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.