Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261173›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Gut Microbial Diversity Assessment of Indian Type-2-Diabetics Reveals Alterations in Eubacteria, Archaea, and Eukaryotes.

Shrikant S Bhute, Mangesh V Suryavanshi, Suyog M Joshi, Chittaranjan S Yajnik, Yogesh S Shouche, Saroj S Ghaskadbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Gut Mycobiome for Precision Medicine.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Parkinson's disease and glucose metabolism impairment.Translational neurodegeneration · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shrikant S BhuteDepartment of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India.
Mangesh V SuryavanshiMicrobial Culture Collection-National Centre for Cell Science Pune, India.
Suyog M JoshiDiabetes Unit, KEM Hospital and Research Centre Pune, India.
Chittaranjan S YajnikDiabetes Unit, KEM Hospital and Research Centre Pune, India.
Yogesh S ShoucheMicrobial Culture Collection-National Centre for Cell Science Pune, India.
Saroj S GhaskadbiDepartment of Zoology, Savitribai Phule Pune University Pune, India.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes in India has distinct genetic, nutritional, developmental and socio-economic aspects; owing to the fact that changes in gut microbiota are associated with diabetes, we employed semiconductor-based sequencing to characterize gut microbiota of diabetic subjects from this region. We suggest consolidated dysbiosis of eubacterial, archaeal and eukaryotic components in the gut microbiota of newly diagnosed (New-DMs) and long-standing diabetic subjects (Known-DMs) compared to healthy subjects (NGTs). Increased abundance of phylum Firmicutes (

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingarchaeadiabeteseubacteriaeukaryagut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID28261173
PMCPMC5306211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.