Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261103›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2017

Novel Computational Analysis of Left Atrial Anatomy Improves Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Ablation.

Marta Varela, Felipe Bisbal, Ernesto Zacur, Antonio Berruezo, Oleg V Aslanidi, Lluis Mont, Pablo Lamata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Le Cœur en Sabot: shape associations with adverse events in repaired tetralogy of Fallot.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Big Data in electrophysiology.Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marta VarelaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London London, UK.
Felipe BisbalArrhythmia Unit-Heart Institute (iCor), Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona, Spain.
Ernesto ZacurDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College LondonLondon, UK; Department of Engineering Science, University of OxfordOxford, UK.
Antonio BerruezoUnitat de Fibrillació Auricular, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Oleg V AslanidiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London London, UK.
Lluis MontUnitat de Fibrillació Auricular, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Pablo LamataDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/15/8/31130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The left atrium (LA) can change in size and shape due to atrial fibrillation (AF)-induced remodeling. These alterations can be linked to poorer outcomes of AF ablation. In this study, we propose a novel comprehensive computational analysis of LA anatomy to identify what features of LA shape can optimally predict post-ablation AF recurrence. To this end, we construct smooth 3D geometrical models from the segmentation of the LA blood pool captured in pre-procedural MR images. We first apply this methodology to characterize the LA anatomy of 144 AF patients and build a statistical shape model that includes the most salient variations in shape across this cohort. We then perform a discriminant analysis to optimally distinguish between recurrent and non-recurrent patients. From this analysis, we propose a new shape metric called vertical asymmetry, which measures the imbalance of size along the anterior to posterior direction between the superior and inferior left atrial hemispheres. Vertical asymmetry was found, in combination with LA sphericity, to be the best predictor of post-ablation recurrence at both 12 and 24 months (area under the ROC curve: 0.71 and 0.68, respectively) outperforming other shape markers and any of their combinations. We also found that model-derived shape metrics, such as the anterior-posterior radius, were better predictors than equivalent metrics taken directly from MRI or echocardiography, suggesting that the proposed approach leads to a reduction of the impact of data artifacts and noise. This novel methodology contributes to an improved characterization of LA organ remodeling and the reported findings have the potential to improve patient selection and risk stratification for catheter ablations in AF.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationbiomarker classificationcomputational anatomyleft atrial remodelingrecurrence risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID28261103
PMCPMC5306209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.