Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261050›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2017

Membrane Active Antimicrobial Peptides: Translating Mechanistic Insights to Design.

Jianguo Li, Jun-Jie Koh, Shouping Liu, Rajamani Lakshminarayanan, Chandra S Verma, Roger W Beuerman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 297 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
297citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

297 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Secretome Profiling ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

237 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianguo LiOcular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore Eye Research InstituteSingapore, Singapore; Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), Bioinformatics InstituteSingapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, SRP Neuroscience and BDSingapore, Singapore.
Jun-Jie KohOcular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore Eye Research Institute Singapore, Singapore.
Shouping LiuOcular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore Eye Research Institute Singapore, Singapore.
Rajamani LakshminarayananOcular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore Eye Research Institute Singapore, Singapore.
Chandra S VermaOcular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore Eye Research InstituteSingapore, Singapore; Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), Bioinformatics InstituteSingapore, Singapore; Department of Biological Sciences, National University of SingaporeSingapore, Singapore; School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore, Singapore.
Roger W BeuermanOcular Chemistry and Anti-Infectives, Singapore Eye Research InstituteSingapore, Singapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, SRP Neuroscience and BDSingapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are promising next generation antibiotics that hold great potential for combating bacterial resistance. AMPs can be both bacteriostatic and bactericidal, induce rapid killing and display a lower propensity to develop resistance than do conventional antibiotics. Despite significant progress in the past 30 years, no peptide antibiotic has reached the clinic yet. Poor understanding of the action mechanisms and lack of rational design principles have been the two major obstacles that have slowed progress. Technological developments are now enabling multidisciplinary approaches including molecular dynamics simulations combined with biophysics and microbiology toward providing valuable insights into the interactions of AMPs with membranes at atomic level. This has led to increasingly robust models of the mechanisms of action of AMPs and has begun to contribute meaningfully toward the discovery of new AMPs. This review discusses the detailed action mechanisms that have been put forward, with detailed atomistic insights into how the AMPs interact with bacterial membranes. The review further discusses how this knowledge is exploited toward developing design principles for novel AMPs. Finally, the current status, associated challenges, and future directions for the development of AMP therapeutics are discussed.

Indexed as

action mechanismantibiotic resistanceantimicrobial peptidesmembranepeptide antibiotics

Identifiers

PMID28261050
PMCPMC5306396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.