Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28261046›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2017

Fast Detector/First Responder: Interactions between the Superior Colliculus-Pulvinar Pathway and Stimuli Relevant to Primates.

Sandra C Soares, Rafael S Maior, Lynne A Isbell, Carlos Tomaz, Hisao Nishijo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Ecological View of Selective Attention.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Sandra C SoaresDepartment of Education and Psychology, CINTESIS.UA, University of AveiroAveiro, Portugal; Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstituteStockholm, Sweden; William James Research Center, Instituto Superior de Psicologia AplicadaLisbon, Portugal.
Rafael S MaiorDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska InstituteStockholm, Sweden; Department of Physiological Sciences, Primate Center, Institute of Biology, University of BrasíliaBrasília, Brazil.
Lynne A IsbellDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Davis Davis, CA, USA.
Carlos TomazDepartment of Physiological Sciences, Primate Center, Institute of Biology, University of BrasíliaBrasília, Brazil; Ceuma University, Neuroscience Research CoordinationSão Luis, Brazil.
Hisao NishijoSystem Emotional Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama Toyama, Japan.
Centro Universitário do Maranhão · BRKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primates are distinguished from other mammals by their heavy reliance on the visual sense, which occurred as a result of natural selection continually favoring those individuals whose visual systems were more responsive to challenges in the natural world. Here we describe two independent but also interrelated visual systems, one cortical and the other subcortical, both of which have been modified and expanded in primates for different functions. Available evidence suggests that while the cortical visual system mainly functions to give primates the ability to assess and adjust to fluid social and ecological environments, the subcortical visual system appears to function as a rapid detector and first responder when time is of the essence, i.e., when survival requires very quick action. We focus here on the subcortical visual system with a review of behavioral and neurophysiological evidence that demonstrates its sensitivity to particular, often emotionally charged, ecological and social stimuli, i.e., snakes and fearful and aggressive facial expressions in conspecifics. We also review the literature on subcortical involvement during another, less emotional, situation that requires rapid detection and response-visually guided reaching and grasping during locomotion-to further emphasize our argument that the subcortical visual system evolved as a rapid detector/first responder, a function that remains in place today. Finally, we argue that investigating deficits in this subcortical system may provide greater understanding of Parkinson's disease and Autism Spectrum disorders (ASD).

Indexed as

evolutionfacesprimatespulvinarsnake detection theorysuperior colliculus

Identifiers

PMID28261046
PMCPMC5314318
OpenAlexW2588795574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.