ReviewClinical epidemiology2017
The clinical impact of serrated colorectal polyps.
Review in Clinical epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening and Risk Assessment through Predictive Modeling on Medical Images and Records.The American journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Dietary pattern and lifestyle risk factors for sessile serrated precursors to colorectal cancer.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Risk Factors in Serrated Pathway Lesions: N-Glycosylation Profile as a Potential Biomarker of Progression to Malignancy.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2024Article
- Cellular and molecular events in colorectal cancer: biological mechanisms, cell death pathways, drug resistance and signalling network interactions.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- The Impact ofCancers · 2023Article
- Three pathologic criteria for reproducible diagnosis of colonic sessile serrated lesion versus hyperplastic polyp.Human pathology · 2023Article
- Clinicopathological Features of Sessile Serrated Polyps in China: A Retrospective Study of a Tertiary Hospital.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population-implications for colorectal cancer screening?International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Observational
- Predictors of Incident Serrated Polyps: Results from a Large Multicenter Clinical Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Article
- Management of early rectal cancer; current surgical options and future direction.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- Detection of Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Neoplasia by Multi-target Stool DNA.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Detection and clinical characteristics of serrated polyps and conventional adenomas between patients in the outpatient and physical checkup unit receiving colonoscopy.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- Serrated lesions of the colon and rectum: Emergent epidemiological data and molecular pathways.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2020Review
- Validation of serrated polyps (SPs) in Swedish pathology registers.BMC gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Interleukin 1 beta and Matrix Metallopeptidase 3 Contribute to Development of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Dependent Serrated Polyps in Mouse Cecum.Gastroenterology · 2019Article
- Volumetric growth rates of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps observed in situ at longitudinal CT colonography.European radiology · 2019Article
- Investigating the TLR9 mRNA Expression Level in Different Histological Types of Colorectal Polyps.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Review
- Article
- Spontaneous Expulsion per Rectum of a Colorectal Polyp: A Rare and Unusual Case.Gastroenterology research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Serrated polyps (SPs) of the colorectum pose a novel challenge to practicing gastroenterologists. Previously thought benign and unimportant, there is now compelling evidence that SPs are responsible for a significant percentage of incident colorectal cancer worldwide. In contrast to conventional adenomas, which tend to be slow growing and polypoid, SPs have unique features that undermine current screening and surveillance practices. For example, sessile serrated polyps (SSPs) are flat, predominately right-sided, and thought to have the potential for rapid growth. Moreover, SSPs are subject to wide variations in endoscopic detection and pathologic interpretation. Unfortunately, little is known about the natural history of SPs, and current guidelines are based largely on expert opinion. In this review, we outline the current taxonomy, epidemiology, and management of SPs with an emphasis on the clinical and public health impact of these lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.