Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28260529›Full record

ArticleInfectious diseases of poverty2017

Implementing a vector surveillance-response system for chagas disease control: a 4-year field trial in Nicaragua.

Kota Yoshioka, Doribel Tercero, Byron Pérez, Jiro Nakamura, Lenin Pérez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious diseases of poverty, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Healthcare Policies to Eliminate Neglected Tropical Diseases (NTDs) in India: A Roadmap.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  4. Preparedness for Chagas disease spreading worldwide.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kota YoshiokaDoctor of Public Health Program, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA. yoshiokakota@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8463-4913
Doribel TerceroFormer Chagas Disease Control Project, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Managua, Nicaragua.
Byron PérezFormer Chagas Disease Control Project, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Managua, Nicaragua.
Jiro NakamuraFormer Chagas Disease Control Project, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Managua, Nicaragua.
Lenin PérezFormer Chagas Disease Control Project, Japan International Cooperation Agency, Managua, Nicaragua.
Japan International Cooperation Agency · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease is one of the neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). International goals for its control involve elimination of vector-borne transmission. Central American countries face challenges in establishing sustainable vector control programmes, since the main vector, Triatoma dimidiata, cannot be eliminated. In 2012, the Ministry of Health in Nicaragua started a field test of a vector surveillance-response system to control domestic vector infestation. This paper reports the main findings from this pilot study.

methodsThis study was carried out from 2012 to 2015 in the Municipality of Totogalpa. The Japan International Cooperation Agency provided technical cooperation in designing and monitoring the surveillance-response system until 2014. This system involved 1) vector reports by householders to health facilities, 2) data analysis and planning of responses at the municipal health centre and 3) house visits or insecticide spraying by health personnel as a response. We registered all vector reports and responses in a digital database. The collected data were used to describe and analyse the system performance in terms of amount of vector reports as well as rates and timeliness of responses.

resultsDuring the study period, T. dimidiata was reported 396 times. Spatiotemporal analysis identified some high-risk clusters. All houses reported to be infested were visited by health personnel in 2013 and this response rate dropped to 39% in 2015. Rates of insecticide spraying rose above 80% in 2013 but no spraying was carried out in the following 2 years. The timeliness of house visits improved significantly after the responsibility was transferred from a vector control technician to primary health care staff.

conclusionsWe argue that the proposed vector surveillance-response system is workable within the resource-constrained health system in Nicaragua. Integration to the primary health care services was a key to improve the system performance. Continual efforts are necessary to keep adapting the surveillance-response system to the dynamic health systems. We also discuss that the goal of eliminating vector-borne transmission remains unachievable. This paper provides lessons not only for Chagas disease control in Central America, but also for control efforts for other NTDs that need a sustainable surveillance-response system to support elimination.

Indexed as

AnimalsChagas DiseaseHumansInsect ControlInsect VectorsNeglected DiseasesNicaraguaPilot ProjectsPopulation SurveillanceProgram EvaluationTriatomaChagas diseaseNicaraguaProgramme integrationSurveillance-response systemTriatoma dimidiataVector control

Identifiers

PMID28260529
PMCPMC5338093
OpenAlexW2577102385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.