Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28260212›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2017

Conservation of somatic tissue derived from collared peccaries (Pecari tajacu Linnaeus, 1758) using direct or solid-surface vitrification techniques.

Alana Azevedo Borges, Gabriela Liberalino Lima, Luiza Bento de Queiroz Neta, Maria Valéria de Oliveira Santos, Moacir Franco de Oliveira, Alexandre Rodrigues Silva, Alexsandra Fernandes Pereira

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alana Azevedo BorgesLaboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semiarid, Mossoro, 59625900, Brazil.
Gabriela Liberalino LimaLaboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Federal Rural University of Semiarid, Mossoro, 59625900, Brazil.
Luiza Bento de Queiroz NetaLaboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semiarid, Mossoro, 59625900, Brazil.
Maria Valéria de Oliveira SantosLaboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semiarid, Mossoro, 59625900, Brazil.
Moacir Franco de OliveiraLaboratory of Applied Animal Morphophysiology, Federal Rural University of Semiarid, Mossoro, 59625900, Brazil.
Alexandre Rodrigues SilvaLaboratory of Animal Germplasm Conservation, Federal Rural University of Semiarid, Mossoro, 59625900, Brazil.
Alexsandra Fernandes PereiraLaboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Federal Rural University of Semiarid, Mossoro, 59625900, Brazil. alexsandra.pereira@ufersa.edu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3170-9640
Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryopreservation of somatic tissue can be applied in biodiversity conservation, especially for wild species as collared peccary. We aimed to evaluate the effect of vitrification techniques of ear tissue of collared peccary [direct vitrification in cryovials (DVC) or solid-surface vitrification (SSV)] on the layers of epidermis and dermis by conventional histology and cell ability during the in vitro culture. Thus, both the vitrification methods were able to maintain normal patterns of the epidermis as the cornea and granular layers, furthermore the intercellular space and dermal-epidermal junction of the spinous layer when compared to fresh control. Nevertheless, DVC and SSV percentage of normality decreased in the morphological integrity of cytoplasm (37.5 and 25.0%) of spinous layer, respectively, as compared to the fresh fragments (100%, p < 0.05). Moreover, other differences between the fresh control (100%) and DVC tissues were verified in the intra-epidermal cleavage of the spinous (37.5%) and basal (37.5%) layers. In general, DVC and SSV techniques were efficient for the recovery of the somatic cells according to most of the evaluated parameters for the in vitro culture (p > 0.05). In addition, only at time of 72 h (D3), in the growth curve, DVC fragments showed a reduced cell concentration than fresh control. In conclusion, SSV was found to be a more efficient method for vitrifying collared peccary skin tissue when compared to DVC. These results are relevant for the tissue cryopreservation from collared peccary and could also be useful for mammals with phylogenetic relationships.

Indexed as

CryopreservationDermisEpidermisIn vitro cultureSomatic cellWild animals

Identifiers

PMID28260212
PMCPMC5507844
OpenAlexW2593573984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.