Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28260166›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2017

Population PBPK modelling of trastuzumab: a framework for quantifying and predicting inter-individual variability.

Paul R V Malik, Abdullah Hamadeh, Colin Phipps, Andrea N Edginton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PBPK model reporting template for chemical risk assessment applications.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul R V MalikSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 10A Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1C5, Canada.
Abdullah HamadehSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 10A Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1C5, Canada.
Colin PhippsSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 10A Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1C5, Canada.
Andrea N EdgintonSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 10A Victoria St S, Kitchener, ON, N2G 1C5, Canada. aedginto@uwaterloo.ca.
University of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work we proposed a population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (popPBPK) framework for quantifying and predicting inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability using the anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab as an example. First, a PBPK model was developed to account for the possible mechanistic sources of variability. Within the model, five key factors that contribute to variability were identified and the nature of their contribution was quantified with local and global sensitivity analyses. The five key factors were the concentration of membrane-bound HER2 ([Formula: see text]), the convective flow rate of mAb through vascular pores ([Formula: see text]), the endocytic transport rate of mAb through vascular endothelium ([Formula: see text]), the degradation rate of mAb-HER2 complexes ([Formula: see text]) and the concentration of shed HER2 extracellular domain in circulation ([Formula: see text]). [Formula: see text] was the most important parameter governing trastuzumab distribution into tissues and primarily affected variability in the first 500 h post-administration. [Formula: see text] was the most significant contributor to variability in clearance. These findings were used together with population generation methods to accurately predict the observed variability in four experimental trials with trastuzumab. To explore anthropometric sources of variability, virtual populations were created to represent participants in the four experimental trials. Using populations with only their expected anthropometric diversity resulted in under-prediction of the observed inter-individual variability. Adapting the populations to include literature-based variability around the five key parameters enabled accurate predictions of the variability in the four trials. The successful application of this framework demonstrates the utility of popPBPK methods to understand the mechanistic underpinnings of pharmacokinetic variability.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological Variation, PopulationBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodTissue DistributionTrastuzumabYoung AdultAntibodies, MonoclonalTrastuzumabInter-individual variabilityMonoclonal antibodyPBPKPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID28260166
OpenAlexW2594304083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.