Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28260121›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2017

Assessing and Managing Natural Resource Damages: Continuing Challenges and Opportunities.

Lawrence W Barnthouse, Ralph G Stahl

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lawrence W BarnthouseLWB Environmental Services, Inc., 1620 New London Rd., Hamilton, OH, 45013, USA. Barnthouse@lwb-env.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-8794
Ralph G StahlDuPont Corporate Remediation Group, Chestnut Run Plaza, Bldg 730, Rm 3170-8 974 Centre Road, P.O. Box 2915, Wilmington, Delaware, 19805, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a 2002 paper, we discussed the technical challenges associated with quantifying natural resource injuries, service losses and damages, and suggested some actions that might help to overcome them. An important suggestion was to consider using some of the approaches in ecological risk assessment to help evaluate potential natural resource injuries, and ultimately in some cases to help translate those injuries into natural resource service loss. This was based on the observation that ecological risk assessment and natural resource damage assessments use much of the same types of data, but at that time the experience base with ecological risk assessment was greater than for natural resource damage assessments. We also discussed some of the issues in applying the then current Department of Interior natural resource damage assessments regulations. Since our 2002 publication the scientific literature, relevant regulations, the global context and more have changed. In the current paper we focus on the technical and regulatory changes in natural resource damage assessments practice since 2002, and use recent reports and publications to illustrate those changes and identify new directions in natural resource damage assessments.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcological and Environmental PhenomenaGovernment RegulationNatural ResourcesRisk AssessmentEcological risk assessmentEnvironmental managementNatural resource damages

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.