Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28260118›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2017

Effects of the Inoculant Strain Pseudomonas sp. SPN31 nah

Vanessa Oliveira, Newton C M Gomes, Magda Santos, Adelaide Almeida, Ana I Lillebø, João Ezequiel, João Serôdio, Artur M S Silva, Mário M Q Simões, Sílvia M Rocha and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vanessa OliveiraDepartment of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Newton C M GomesDepartment of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Magda SantosDepartment of Chemistry and QOPNA, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Adelaide AlmeidaDepartment of Chemistry and QOPNA, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Ana I LillebøDepartment of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
João EzequielDepartment of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
João SerôdioDepartment of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Artur M S SilvaDepartment of Chemistry and QOPNA, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Mário M Q SimõesDepartment of Chemistry and QOPNA, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Sílvia M RochaDepartment of Chemistry and QOPNA, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.
Ângela CunhaDepartment of Biology and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal. acunha@ua.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9118-3521

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of the inoculation of the saltmarsh plant (Halimione portulacoides) with Pseudomonas sp. SPN31 nah+ combined with exposure to 2-methylnaphthalene (2-MtN) on the plant rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial communities as well as on plant health. To achieve this goal, microcosm experiments were set up. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles and statistical analysis showed that rhizosphere and endosphere bacterial communities had distinct responses to plant inoculation and/or exposure to 2-MtN. PCR-sequencing analysis of nah genes encoding for 2-MtN degrading enzymes suggested the presence of Pseudomonas sp. SPN31 nah+ in the endosphere of H. portulacoides with 2-MtN contamination. Moreover, a significant effect in the photosynthetic performance of inoculated plants was detected. To conclude, despite the potential beneficial effect of plant inoculation with Pseudomonas sp. SPN31 nah+ endophytic bacteria may have on plant health, no significant effect on the removal of MtN was detected for the level of contamination used in the study.

Indexed as

BacteriaRhizosphereBiodegradation, EnvironmentalChenopodiaceaeGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGenes, BacterialNaphthalenesPhotosynthesisPhylogenyPlant RootsPseudomonasRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsVolatile Organic Compounds2-methylnaphthaleneNaphthalenesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil PollutantsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID28260118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.