Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28260012›Full record

Trial reportOncology reports2017

Novel quantitative analysis of the S100P protein combined with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Masafumi Chiba, Hiroo Imazu, Masayuki Kato, Keiichi Ikeda, Hiroshi Arakawa, Tomohiro Kato, Kazuki Sumiyama, Sadamu Homma

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Endoscopic Ultrasound Imaging for Differential Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neoplasms: A 7-Year Study in a Chinese Population.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masafumi ChibaDepartment of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Hiroo ImazuDepartment of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Masayuki KatoDepartment of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Keiichi IkedaDepartment of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Hiroshi ArakawaDepartment of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Tomohiro KatoDepartment of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Kazuki SumiyamaDepartment of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Sadamu HommaDepartment of Oncology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Specimens obtained with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are often tiny and fragmented leading to an inconclusive and doubtful diagnosis. To overcome the limitations of EUS-FNA in the cytological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCA), we evaluated whether quantification of the S100P protein combined with EUS-FNA reliably discriminated between PCA and benign pancreatic lesions (BPL). A high sensitivity sandwich ELISA for S100P protein was developed to aid in the detection of PCA in small samples obtained using EUS-FNA. After experimental verification of the sandwich ELISA with cell lines and mouse xenograft tumors, 27 consecutive patients with suspicious PCA who underwent EUS-FNA were enrolled in the present study examining the combination of S100P protein assessment and EUS-FNA cytology. The concentration of the S100P protein in EUS-FNA samples from the PCA group was significantly higher than that in the BPL group (P=0.04). Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we determined the S100P protein cut-off value for PCA diagnosis to be 99.8 ng/ml. The S100P protein levels combined with EUS-FNA cytology to detect PCA showed the following diagnostic values: sensitivity, 94.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 75.7-99.1%]; specificity, 88.9% (95% CI, 51.8-99.7%); positive predictive value, 94.4% (95% CI, 72.7-99.9%); negative predictive value, 88.9% (95% CI, 51.8-99.7%); accuracy, 92.6% (95% CI, 75.7‑99.1%); and area under the curve, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.79-1.00). We established a novel quantitative analysis for the S100P protein in EUS-FNA samples which, when combined with EUS-FNA cytology, could provide promising results for the reliable diagnosis of PCA.

Indexed as

CytodiagnosisAdenomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsCalcium-Binding ProteinsCell Line, TumorEndoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle AspirationFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiceMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsCalcium-Binding ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsS100P protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28260012
PMCPMC5367330
OpenAlexW2589336934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.