Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28259986›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2017

Identification of key genes and pathways associated with spinal cord injury.

Yue-Hui Zhang, Jia Song, Li-Gang Wang, Jiang Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yue-Hui ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
Jia SongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
Li-Gang WangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.
Jiang ShaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was designed to identify key genes or significant signaling pathways associated with spinal cord injury (SCI), and to clarify the underlying molecular mechanisms of SCI. Data from the GSE45550 array were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. A total of 6 control samples, 6 samples at 3 days post‑SCI (SCI3d), 6 samples at 8 days post‑SCI (SCI8d) and 6 samples at 14 days post‑SCI (SCI14d) were included. The microarray data was preprocessed by the robust multi‑array average algorithm. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified using the limma package. The overlapping DEGs among groups were analyzed using the Venny 2.0 online tool. Modules enriched by DEGs were selected by weighted gene co‑expression network analysis. Gene Ontology annotation and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathways were identified for DEGs using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery. A total of 693 genes were obtained by combining the DEGs of the SCI3d, SCI8d and SCI14d groups. The pink module and green module with smaller P‑values obtained from weighted gene co‑expression network analysis module analyses of DEGs demonstrated a higher correlation with SCI. In addition, the peroxisome proliferator‑activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway that the cluster of differentiation 36 (CD36) was significantly enriched in, was one of the significant pathways in the pink module. The p53 signaling pathway that Caspase‑3 (Casp3) was significantly enriched in was one of the significant pathways in the green module. In conclusion, the results of the present study demonstrated that the PPAR and p53 signaling pathway may serve important roles in the progression of SCI. In addition, CD36 and Casp3 may be involved in the progression of SCI via the PPAR and p53 signaling pathways, respectively.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCluster AnalysisDown-RegulationGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansSignal TransductionSpinal Cord InjuriesUp-Regulation

Identifiers

PMID28259986
PMCPMC5364968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.