Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28259855›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

Restrictive versus liberal fluid therapy in major abdominal surgery (RELIEF): rationale and design for a multicentre randomised trial.

Paul Myles, Rinaldo Bellomo, Tomas Corcoran, Andrew Forbes, Sophie Wallace, Philip Peyton, Chris Christophi, David Story, Kate Leslie, Jonathan Serpell and 3 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01424150 nacompletednot on this map

Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Major Abdominal Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayside HealthRan2013 to 2017Enrolled3,000ConditionsAbdominal SurgeryArmsLiberal fluid therapy, Restrictive fluid therapy
NCT06104020 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of Lung Ultrasound-Guided Intraoperative Fluid Management Strategies: Assessing Their Impact on Post-operative Pulmonary Complications and Hemodynamics in Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgerys

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsShoulder Arthropathy Associated With Other ConditionsArmsIntraoperative fluid management stratigies.
NCT07072897 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Restrictive Versus Liberal Fluid Therapy in Patients Undergoing Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Institute Of Medicine.Ran2020 to 2021Enrolled44ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Resected, Whipple ProcedureArmsFluid bolus administration, Frusemide was given when required
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Postoperative hypotension in gastric cancer patients: causes and clinical approaches.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. A Single-Center Retrospective Study of Selected Clinical Parameters and Intraoperative Fluid Management of Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Accuracy of Estimated Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring (esCCO) Using Pulse Wave Transit Time (PWTT) Compared to Arterial Pressure-based CO (APCO) Measurement during Major Surgeries.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. [Clinical research on perioperative restrictive fluid therapy combined with preoperative urination training in total hip arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2019
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul MylesAlfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tomas CorcoranUniversity of Western Australia, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew ForbesMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sophie WallaceAlfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Philip PeytonAustin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris ChristophiAustin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David StoryThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kate LeslieMonash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan SerpellAlfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shay McGuinnessAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rachel ParkeAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Clinical Trials Network, and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group
Monash University · AUAuckland City Hospital · NZAustin Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe Alfred Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe optimal intravenous fluid regimen for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery is unclear. However, results from many small studies suggest a restrictive regimen may lead to better outcomes. A large, definitive clinical trial evaluating perioperative fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery, therefore, is required. METHODS/ANALYSIS: We designed a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (the RELIEF trial). A total of 3000 patients were enrolled in this study and randomly allocated to a restrictive or liberal fluid regimen in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by centre and planned critical care admission. The expected fluid volumes in the first 24 hour from the start of surgery in restrictive and liberal groups were ≤3.0 L and ≥5.4 L, respectively. Patient enrolment is complete, and follow-up for the primary end point is ongoing. The primary outcome is disability-free survival at 1 year after surgery, with disability defined as a persistent (at least 6 months) reduction in functional status using the 12-item version of the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule. ETHICS/DISSEMINATION: The RELIEF trial has been approved by the responsible ethics committees of all participating sites. Participant recruitment began in March 2013 and was completed in August 2016, and 1-year follow-up will conclude in August 2017. Publication of the results of the RELIEF trial is anticipated in early 2018. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01424150.

Indexed as

Research DesignAbdomenAdultAgedFemaleFluid TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultANAESTHETICSINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE

Identifiers

PMID28259855
PMCPMC5353290
OpenAlexW2592310224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.