Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28259750›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2017

Long-Term Outcomes of Salvage Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Isolated Lung Recurrence of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Clinical Trial.

Bing Sun, Eric D Brooks, Ritsuko Komaki, Zhongxing Liao, Melenda Jeter, Mary McAleer, Peter A Balter, James D Welsh, Michael O'Reilly, Daniel Gomez and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Reirradiation - still navigating uncharted waters?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Developments in radiation techniques for thoracic malignancies.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Target volume definition for staple line recurrences of non-small cell lung cancer.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bing SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Eric D BrooksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ritsuko KomakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Zhongxing LiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Melenda JeterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mary McAleerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Peter A BalterDepartment of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
James D WelshDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Michael O'ReillyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Daniel GomezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Stephen M HahnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Boris SepesiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
David C RiceDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
John V HeymachDepartment of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Joe Y ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: jychang@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
U OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON CENTER FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1RR024148 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2006 to 2010
$27.9M
Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS)UL1TR000371 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2012 to 2016
$13.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000371NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur goal was to evaluate stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a salvage option for isolated recurrence of NSCLC in the lung parenchyma after definitive treatment of stage I to III disease.

methodsPatients who had histologically confirmed, positron emission tomography-staged, isolated NSCLC recurring locally or metastasis in the lung parenchyma (≤3 cm, suitable for SABR) after previous definitive treatment were prospectively enrolled in this trial and treated with volumetric, image-guided SABR to 50 Gy in four fractions. Patients were then followed with computed tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Primary end points included the pattern of failure after salvage SABR, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsFifty-nine patients with recurrent disease were treated with salvage SABR. The median age was 70 years (range 45-86 years), and the median follow-up time after salvage SABR was 58.3 months. Re-recurrence after salvage SABR developed in 19 patients (32%). Measuring from the date of salvage SABR, the estimated 5-year rates of local, regional, and distant failure were 5.2%, 10.3%, and 22.4%, respectively; the estimated PFS was 46.2% at 3 years and 41.1% at 5 years; and the OS rates were 63.5% at 3 years and 56.5% at 5 years. A high post-SABR neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was found to predict poor survival. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events developed in three patients (5%). No patient had a grade 4 or 5 event.

conclusionOur study showed that salvage SABR provides excellent 5-year OS, local control, and PFS rates with minimal toxicity for patients with isolated NSCLC recurrence in the lung parenchyma. These results are striking and comparable to historically reported outcomes of patients with primary early-stage NSCLC treated with definitive SABR. SABR appears to be a very effective and safe salvage option for patients with isolated lung parenchyma recurrent disease after definitive treatment and should be considered along with surgery as a potential first-line option for patients with local lung parenchymal recurrent disease.

Indexed as

Salvage TherapyAdenocarcinomaAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCarcinoma, Squamous CellDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProspective StudiesNon–small cell lung cancerPattern of failureRecurrent lung cancerStereotactic ablative radiotherapyToxicity

Identifiers

PMID28259750
PMCPMC5881570
OpenAlexW2593495869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.