Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28259165›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2017

Validating the role of the Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI) and a genetic risk score in progression to cognitive impairment in a population-based cohort of older adults followed for 12 years.

Shea J Andrews, Ranmalee Eramudugolla, Jorge I Velez, Nicolas Cherbuin, Simon Easteal, Kaarin J Anstey

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Umbrella review and Delphi study on modifiable factors for dementia risk reduction.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shea J AndrewsJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. shea.andrews@anu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1921-9470
Ranmalee EramudugollaCentre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Research School of Population Health Australian National University, The Australian National University Florey, Building 54, Mills Road, Acton ACT 2601, Canberra, Australia.
Jorge I VelezJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Nicolas CherbuinCentre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Research School of Population Health Australian National University, The Australian National University Florey, Building 54, Mills Road, Acton ACT 2601, Canberra, Australia.
Simon EastealJohn Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Kaarin J AnsteyCentre for Research on Ageing, Health and Wellbeing, Research School of Population Health Australian National University, The Australian National University Florey, Building 54, Mills Road, Acton ACT 2601, Canberra, Australia.
Australian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of people living with dementia is expected to exceed 130 million by 2050, which will have serious personal, social and economic implications. Employing successful intervention and treatment strategies focused on disease prevention is currently the only available approach that can have an impact on the projected rates of dementia, with risk assessment being a key component of population-based risk reduction for identification of at-risk individuals. We evaluated a risk index comprising lifestyle, medical and demographic factors (the Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index [ANU-ADRI]), as well as a genetic risk score (GRS), for assessment of the risk of progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsThe ANU-ADRI was computed for the baseline assessment of 2078 participants in the Personality and Total Health (PATH) Through Life project. GRSs were constructed on the basis of 25 single-nucleotide polymorphisms previously associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Participants were assessed for clinically diagnosed MCI and dementia as well as psychometric test-based MCI (MCI-TB) at 12 years of follow-up. Multi-state models were used to estimate the odds of transitioning from cognitively normal (CN) to MCI, dementia and MCI-TB over 12 years according to baseline ANU-ADRI and GRS.

resultsA higher ANU-ADRI score was associated with increased risk of progressing from CN to both MCI and MCI-TB (HR 1.07 [95% CI 1.04-1.11]; 1.07 [1.04-1.09]). The GRS was associated with transitions from CN to dementia (HR 4.19 [95% CI 1.72-10.20), but not to MCI or MCI-TB (HR 1.05 [95% CI 0.86-1.29]; 1.03 [0.87-1.21]). Limitations of our study include that the ethnicity of participants in the PATH project is predominately Caucasian, potentially limiting the generalisability of the results of this study to people of other ethnicities. Biomarkers of AD were not available to define MCI attributable to AD. Not all the predictive variables for the ANU-ADRI were available in the PATH project.

conclusionsIn the general population, the ANU-ADRI, comprising lifestyle, medical and demographic factors, is associated with the risk of progression from CN to MCI, whereas a GRS comprising the main AD risk genes was not associated with this risk. The ANU-ADRI may be used for population-level risk assessment and screening.

Indexed as

Proportional Hazards ModelsAgedAlzheimer DiseaseAustraliaAustralian Capital TerritoryCognitive DysfunctionComorbidityDisease ProgressionFemaleGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleGenetic MarkersAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitive agingCohort studiesMild cognitive impairment (MCI)Multi-state modelsRisk factors in epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID28259165
PMCPMC5336661
OpenAlexW2593825861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.