Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28259158›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2017

Detection of statistically significant network changes in complex biological networks.

Raghvendra Mall, Luigi Cerulo, Halima Bensmail, Antonio Iavarone, Michele Ceccarelli

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modularity in Biological Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Differentially mutated subnetworks discovery.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Raghvendra MallQCRI - Qatar Computing Research Institute, HBKU, Doha, Qatar. rmall@qf.org.qa.
Luigi CeruloDepartment of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy.
Halima BensmailQCRI - Qatar Computing Research Institute, HBKU, Doha, Qatar.
Antonio IavaroneDepartment of Neurology, Department of Pathology, Institute for Cancer Genetics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA.
Michele CeccarelliQCRI - Qatar Computing Research Institute, HBKU, Doha, Qatar. mceccarelli@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4702-6617
Qatar Cardiovascular Research Center · QAUniversity of Sannio · ITColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiological networks contribute effectively to unveil the complex structure of molecular interactions and to discover driver genes especially in cancer context. It can happen that due to gene mutations, as for example when cancer progresses, the gene expression network undergoes some amount of localized re-wiring. The ability to detect statistical relevant changes in the interaction patterns induced by the progression of the disease can lead to the discovery of novel relevant signatures. Several procedures have been recently proposed to detect sub-network differences in pairwise labeled weighted networks.

methodsIn this paper, we propose an improvement over the state-of-the-art based on the Generalized Hamming Distance adopted for evaluating the topological difference between two networks and estimating its statistical significance. The proposed procedure exploits a more effective model selection criteria to generate p-values for statistical significance and is more efficient in terms of computational time and prediction accuracy than literature methods. Moreover, the structure of the proposed algorithm allows for a faster parallelized implementation.

resultsIn the case of dense random geometric networks the proposed approach is 10-15x faster and achieves 5-10% higher AUC, Precision/Recall, and Kappa value than the state-of-the-art. We also report the application of the method to dissect the difference between the regulatory networks of IDH-mutant versus IDH-wild-type glioma cancer. In such a case our method is able to identify some recently reported master regulators as well as novel important candidates.

conclusionsWe show that our network differencing procedure can effectively and efficiently detect statistical significant network re-wirings in different conditions. When applied to detect the main differences between the networks of IDH-mutant and IDH-wild-type glioma tumors, it correctly selects sub-networks centered on important key regulators of these two different subtypes. In addition, its application highlights several novel candidates that cannot be detected by standard single network-based approaches.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyGene Regulatory NetworksGliomaTranscription FactorsTranscription FactorsDifferential networksGene regulatory network inferenceMaster regulators

Identifiers

PMID28259158
PMCPMC5336651
OpenAlexW2950144725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.