Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28258551›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2017

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).

Madhusudhana R Janga, LeAnne M Campbell, Keerti S Rathore

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Progress in genetic engineering and genome editing of peanuts: revealing the future of crop improvement.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Biofuels and Sustainability.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Simultaneous Editing of Two Copies ofFrontiers in plant science · 2018
    Article
  18. CRISPR for Crop Improvement: An Update Review.Frontiers in plant science · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Madhusudhana R JangaInstitute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2123, USA.
LeAnne M CampbellInstitute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2123, USA.
Keerti S RathoreInstitute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843-2123, USA. rathore@tamu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated (Cas)9 protein system has emerged as a simple and efficient tool for genome editing in eukaryotic cells. It has been shown to be functional in several crop species, yet there are no reports on the application of this or any other genome editing technologies in the cotton plant. Cotton is an important crop that is grown mainly for its fiber, but its seed also serves as a useful source of edible oil and feed protein. Most of the commercially-grown cotton is tetraploid, thus making it much more difficult to target both sets of homeologous alleles. Therefore, in order to understand the efficacy of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to target a gene within the genome of cotton, we made use of a transgenic cotton line previously generated in our laboratory that had a single copy of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene integrated into its genome. We demonstrate, for the first time, the use of this powerful new tool in targeted knockout of a gene residing in the cotton genome. By following the loss of GFP fluorescence, we were able to observe the cells that had undergone targeted mutations as a result of CRISPR/Cas9 activity. In addition, we provide examples of the different types of indels obtained by Cas9-mediated cleavage of the GFP gene, guided by three independent sgRNAs. The results provide useful information that will help us target important native genes in the cotton plant in future.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenetic EngineeringBase SequenceDNA, PlantGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene Knockout TechniquesGene SilencingGenome, PlantGossypiumMutagenesisPlants, Genetically ModifiedRNA, PlantDNA, PlantRNA, PlantCRISPR/Cas9Gene knockoutGFPGossypium hirsutumsgRNAsTargeted mutagenesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.