Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28258474›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2017

Impact of ultrasonography on treatment decision in rheumatoid arthritis: the IMPULSAR study.

Cèsar Díaz-Torné, Carme Moragues, Elide Toniolo, Carme Geli, Iván Castellví, Patricia Moya, Ignasi Gich, Josep M Llobet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cèsar Díaz-TornéRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain. cesardiaztorne@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6275-7699
Carme MoraguesRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Elide TonioloRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Carme GeliRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Iván CastellvíRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Patricia MoyaRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Ignasi GichRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep M LlobetRheumatology Unit, Service of Internal Medicine, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, C/ Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasonography (US) has shown to be more sensitive than physical examination for diagnosis and assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is also a useful approach for accurate monitoring and intensive treatment adjustment. However, there is limited information concerning the impact of US on therapeutic decision-making in routine daily practice. A single-center cross-sectional study in routine daily practice was conducted to determine the percentage of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in which treatment decision was modified on the basis of results of musculoskeletal ultrasonography. All consecutive patients with RA visited for the control of their disease between September and November 2014 were included. Patients were visited by their attending rheumatologist, who made a therapeutic decision according to the results of physical examination and laboratory tests. Thereafter, a musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) was performed by an independent expert sonographer. According to US findings, a change in therapeutic decision was considered, and categorized as 'negative' (maintenance of the therapeutic attitude) or 'positive' (intensification or reduction of treatment). A total of 78 patients (83% women, mean age 63.3 years) were included. In 29 patients [32%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 26.5-48.9], a change in the therapeutic decision was made, which included intensification of treatment in 18 (62.1%) and reduction of treatment in 11 (37.9%). Change of treatment was more frequent in patients with intermediate disease activity (low and moderate) than in those in clinical remission or with high activity (41.4 vs. 25%), in men than in women (53.8 vs. 33.8%), and in the presence than in the absence of bone erosions (43.6 vs. 21.7%), although differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that in patients with RA, joint US is a relevant complementary tool for treatment decisions in daily practice, particularly in patients with intermediate disease activity.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingUltrasonography, DopplerAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJointsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRemission InductionAntirheumatic AgentsAntirheumatic agentsArthritisRheumatoid/drug therapyRheumatoid/ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID28258474
OpenAlexW2594675483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.