Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28258397›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2017

Multicenter fresh frozen tissue sampling in colorectal cancer: does the quality meet the standards for state of the art biomarker research?

Z S Lalmahomed, R R J Coebergh van den Braak, M H A Oomen, S P Arshad, P H J Riegman, J N M IJzermans, MATCH study working group

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Worse Outcomes After Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Large, Multicenter Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Z S LalmahomedDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
R R J Coebergh van den BraakDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.coeberghvdbraak@erasmusmc.nl.
M H A OomenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
S P ArshadDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
P H J RiegmanDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J N M IJzermansDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
MATCH study working group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing interest in the molecular subclassification of colorectal cancers is increasingly facilitated by large multicenter biobanking initiatives. The quality of tissue sampling is pivotal for successful translational research. This study shows the quality of fresh frozen tissue sampling within a multicenter cohort study for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Each of the seven participating hospitals randomly contributed ten tissue samples, which were collected following Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) using established techniques. To indicate if the amount of intact RNA is sufficient for molecular discovery research and prove SOP compliance, the RNA integrity number (RIN) was determined. Samples with a RIN < 6 were measured a second time and when consistently low a third time. The highest RIN was used for further analysis. 91% of the tissue samples had a RIN ≥ 6 (91%). The remaining six samples had a RIN between 5 and 6 (4.5%) or lower than 5 (4.5%). The median overall RIN was 7.3 (range 2.9-9.0). The median RIN of samples in the university hospital homing the biobank was 7.7 and the median RIN for the teaching hospitals was 7.3, ranging from 6.5 to 7.8. No differences were found in the outcome of different hospitals (p = 0.39). This study shows that the collection of high quality fresh frozen samples of colorectal cancers is feasible in a multicenter design with complete SOP adherence. Thus, using basic sampling techniques large patient cohorts can be organized for predictive and prognostic (bio)marker research for CRC.

Indexed as

AdultBiological Specimen BanksBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesColonColorectal NeoplasmsFreezingHumansPrognosisQuality ControlRectumRNASpecimen HandlingTissue BanksBiomarkers, TumorRNABiobankColorectal cancerRNA integrity numberTissue quality

Identifiers

PMID28258397
PMCPMC5587614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.