Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28258303›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Clinical significance and outcome of Aeromonas spp. infections among 204 adult patients.

J Nolla-Salas, J Codina-Calero, S Vallés-Angulo, A Sitges-Serra, A Zapatero-Ferrándiz, M C Climent, J Gómez, J R Masclans

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Age-Dependent Variations in the Distribution ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Clonal Dissemination ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

J Nolla-SalasDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. jnolla@hospitaldelmar.cat.
J Codina-CaleroDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
S Vallés-AnguloDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
A Sitges-SerraDepartment of Surgery, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
A Zapatero-FerrándizDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
M C ClimentDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
J GómezLaboratori de Referència de Catalunya, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
J R MasclansDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Parc de Salut Mar, Passeig Maritim 25-29, 08003, Barcelona, Spain.
Parc de Salut · ESPompeu Fabra University · ESAjuntament de L’Hospitalet · ESHospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this investigation were to analyze the clinical patterns, risk groups, prognostic factors, and mortality of infections caused by Aeromonas spp. This was a retrospective study of adult patients with Aeromonas spp. isolates attended at the Hospital del Mar in Barcelona, Spain, between January 2006 and December 2012. Epidemiological data, antimicrobial susceptibility, clinical patterns, underlying illnesses, type of infection, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), number of episodes, coinfection, antimicrobial therapy, and evolution were analyzed. A total of 221 clinical samples from 204 patients were positive for Aeromonas spp. The mean age of the patients was 67.6 years. The main clinical form of presentation was gastrointestinal (78.4%). Malignancy was the main risk group in 69 (33.8%) patients, and 48 (23.5%) were previously healthy. Twenty-one patients (10.3%) were admitted to the ICU. Infections were acquired in the hospital in 52.5% of the patients, and 28.9% were polymicrobial. The overall mortality (after 1 year of follow-up from the first positive culture) was 26.5%. Univariate analysis identified an association between increased mortality and the following variables: age ≥80 years, hospitalization, admission to the ICU, malignancy, extraintestinal infection, and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. In the multivariate analysis, age ≥80 years [odds ratio (OR), 4.37 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.68-11.35; p = 0.002]], admission to the ICU (OR, 6.59 [95% CI, 2.17-19.99; p = 0.001]), and malignancy (OR, 3.62 [95% CI, 1.32-9.90; p = 0.012]) were significantly associated with mortality. Aeromonas infections are mainly gastrointestinal. The 1-year follow-up mortality rate was high. Old age (age ≥80 years), admission to the ICU, and malignancy were identified as independent risk factors for mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAeromonasAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoinfectionComorbidityCross InfectionFemaleGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID28258303
PMCPMC7102105
OpenAlexW2593087918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.