ArticleGenetics2017
The Bacterial Sequential Markov Coalescent.
Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hotspots of genetic change in Yersinia pestis.Nature communications · 2025Article
- On the estimation of genome-average recombination rates.Genetics · 2024Article
- Genealogical inference and more flexible sequence clustering using iterative-PopPUNK.Genome research · 2023Article
- VGsim: Scalable viral genealogy simulator for global pandemic.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- phastSim: Efficient simulation of sequence evolution for pandemic-scale datasets.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Efficient ancestry and mutation simulation with msprime 1.0.Genetics · 2022Article
- VGsim: scalable viral genealogy simulator for global pandemic.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2021Article
- phastSim: efficient simulation of sequence evolution for pandemic-scale datasets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2021Article
- Horizontal transmission and recombination maintain forever young bacterial symbiont genomes.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- CoreSimul: a forward-in-time simulator of genome evolution for prokaryotes modeling homologous recombination.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A Bayesian model of acquisition and clearance of bacterial colonization incorporating within-host variation.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Coalescent framework for prokaryotes undergoing interspecific homologous recombination.Heredity · 2018Article
- Bayesian reconstruction of transmission within outbreaks using genomic variants.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Weak Epistasis May Drive Adaptation in Recombining Bacteria.Genetics · 2018Article
- Fitness Tradeoffs of Antibiotic Resistance in Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteria can exchange and acquire new genetic material from other organisms directly and via the environment. This process, known as bacterial recombination, has a strong impact on the evolution of bacteria, for example, leading to the spread of antibiotic resistance across clades and species, and to the avoidance of clonal interference. Recombination hinders phylogenetic and transmission inference because it creates patterns of substitutions (homoplasies) inconsistent with the hypothesis of a single evolutionary tree. Bacterial recombination is typically modeled as statistically akin to gene conversion in eukaryotes,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.