Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28257920›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2017

A web-based personalized risk communication and decision-making tool for women with dense breasts: Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial within an integrated health care system.

Sarah Knerr, Karen J Wernli, Kathleen Leppig, Kelly Ehrlich, Amanda L Graham, David Farrell, Chalanda Evans, George Luta, Marc D Schwartz, Suzanne C O'Neill

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03029286 (ENGAGED 2 Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03029286 nacompletednot on this map

ENGAGED 2 Study: Experiences With Mammography Screening and Breast Density 2

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled995ConditionsBreast Density, Breast Cancer FemaleArmsUsual Care Arm, Personalized Web Intervention Arm
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. [BIRADS 0 patient reclassification in a first-level of care unit].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah KnerrGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA(1). Electronic address: saknerr@uw.edu.
Karen J WernliGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA(1).
Kathleen LeppigClinical Genetics, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA 98112, USA(1).
Kelly EhrlichGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA(1).
Amanda L GrahamSchroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA.
David FarrellPeople Designs, Durham, NC 27705, USA.
Chalanda EvansLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
George LutaLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Marc D SchwartzLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Suzanne C O'NeillLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Georgetown University · USCenter for Infectious Disease Research · USGroup Health Cooperative · USAmerican Legacy Foundation · USPeople Designs (United States) · US

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Louis M Weiner · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Risk-based Imaging Strategies to Improve Breast Cancer Surveillance OutcomesP01CA154292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI KARLA M KERLIKOWSKE · 2011 to 2026
$52.9M
Vermont Screening Process Documentation UnitU54CA163303 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI SPRAGUE, BRIAN L · 2011 to 2017
$6.4M
An eHealth platform to facilitate financial understanding and legal preparation for patients with dementia and their caregiversR44AG074131 · NIA · PEOPLE DESIGNS, INC. · PI FARRELL, DAVID · 2021 to 2023
$2.0M
Applying Breast Density to Risk CounselingR01CA190221 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI O'NEILL, SUZANNE C. · 2015 to 2018
$2.0M
Health Care Improvement for Aging WomenT32AG027677 · NIA · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2007 to 2016
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201100031CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA154292NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA190221NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163303NIA NIH HHS R44 AG074131NIA NIH HHS T32 AG027677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMammographic breast density is one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer after age and family history. Mandatory breast density disclosure policies are increasing nationally without clear guidance on how to communicate density status to women. Coupling density disclosure with personalized risk counseling and decision support through a web-based tool may be an effective way to allow women to make informed, values-consistent risk management decisions without increasing distress. METHODS/

designThis paper describes the design and methods of Engaged, a prospective, randomized controlled trial examining the effect of online personalized risk counseling and decision support on risk management decisions in women with dense breasts and increased breast cancer risk. The trial is embedded in a large integrated health care system in the Pacific Northwest. A total of 1250 female health plan members aged 40-69 with a recent negative screening mammogram who are at increased risk for interval cancer based on their 5-year breast cancer risk and BI-RADS® breast density will be randomly assigned to access either a personalized web-based counseling and decision support tool or standard educational content. Primary outcomes will be assessed using electronic health record data (i.e., chemoprevention and breast MRI utilization) and telephone surveys (i.e., distress) at baseline, six weeks, and twelve months. DISCUSSION: Engaged will provide evidence about whether a web-based personalized risk counseling and decision support tool is an effective method for communicating with women about breast density and risk management. An effective intervention could be disseminated with minimal clinical burden to align with density disclosure mandates. Clinical Trials Registration Number:NCT03029286.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBreast DensityBreast NeoplasmsChemopreventionCounselingDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth ServicesHumansInternetMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsBreast cancerBreast densityBreast MRIChemopreventionPreventionRisk communication

Identifiers

PMID28257920
PMCPMC5473364
OpenAlexW2592732720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.