Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28257640›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of pediatrics2017

Risk factors for Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infection in a neonatal intensive care unit: a case-control study.

Carmine Garzillo, Maria Bagattini, Lidija Bogdanović, Anna Di Popolo, Vita Dora Iula, Maria Rosaria Catania, Francesco Raimondi, Maria Triassi, Raffaele Zarrilli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Typing ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. InvasiveMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. High prevalence of itraconazole resistance amongCurrent medical mycology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Phenotype-driven strategies for screening Candida parapsilosis complex for molecular identification.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carmine GarzilloDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Maria BagattiniDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Lidija BogdanovićDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Anna Di PopoloDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Vita Dora IulaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Maria Rosaria CataniaDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnologies, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Francesco RaimondiDivision of Neonatology, Department of Medical Translational Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Maria TriassiDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Raffaele ZarrilliDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples "Federico II", Via S. Pansini n.5, 80131, Naples, Italy. rafzarri@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4191-9032
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCandida parapsilosis is increasingly responsible for invasive candidiasis in neonates. This study investigates phenotypic and genotypic features of C. parapsilosis microbial isolates and underlying clinical conditions associated with acquisition of C. parapsilosis in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in Italy.

methodsIdentification of C. parapsilosis was performed by VITEK® 2 and MALDI TOF and confirmed by analysis of internal transcribed spacer ribosomal DNA sequences. Genotyping was performed by PCR fingerprinting. Antifungal susceptibility of strains was evaluated by microdilution. A case-control study was designed to identify risk factors for C. parapsilosis bloodstream infection.

resultsDuring the study period (April 2009- April 2012), C. parapsilosis was responsible for 6 umbilical catheter and 11 central catheter-associated bloodstream infection in 17 neonates in the NICU. Molecular typing identified identical fingerprinting profile in all C. parapsilosis isolates from neonates. Fifteen of 17 C. parapsilosis isolates were susceptible to all antifungal drugs, two isolates were resistant to fluconazole and intermediate susceptible to itraconazole. Low birthweight, gestational age and time to exposure to assisted ventilation were risk factors for C. parapsilosis infection in neonates in the NICU at univariate and multivariate analysis.

conclusionC. parapsilosis bloodstream infections in the NICU were caused by a single epidemic clone. Low birthweight, gestational age and time to exposure to invasive devices, with predominance of assisted ventilation, were the clinical conditions associated with C. parapsilosis bloodstream infection in the NICU.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalRisk AssessmentCandida parapsilosisCandidiasisCase-Control StudiesCross InfectionFemaleFungemiaHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornItalyMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRisk FactorsCandida parapsilosisHealthcare-associated infectionsLow birth weightNeonatal intensive care unitRisk factor analysis

Identifiers

PMID28257640
PMCPMC5347820
OpenAlexW2572966100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.