Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28257602›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2017

The Biomarkers of Lupus Disease Study: A Bold Approach May Mitigate Interference of Background Immunosuppressants in Clinical Trials.

Joan T Merrill, Fred Immermann, Maryann Whitley, Tianhui Zhou, Andrew Hill, Margot O'Toole, Padmalatha Reddy, Marek Honczarenko, Aikaterini Thanou, Joe Rawdon and 3 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Joan T MerrillOklahoma Medical Research Foundation and University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Fred ImmermannPfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Maryann WhitleyPfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Tianhui ZhouPfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Andrew HillPfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Margot O'ToolePfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Padmalatha ReddyPfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Marek HonczarenkoPfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Aikaterini ThanouOklahoma Medical Research Foundation and University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Joe RawdonOklahoma Medical Research Foundation and University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Joel M GuthridgeOklahoma Medical Research Foundation and University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Judith A JamesOklahoma Medical Research Foundation and University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
Sudhakar SridharanPfizer, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Pfizer (United States) · USUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USOklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI PAUL G SPICER · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
SNP Confirmation and High Throughput Genotyping CoreP30AR053483 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GUTHRIDGE, JOEL MARVIN · 2007 to 2017
$6.7M
Pre-Clinical Studies to Identify SLE Therapeutic TargetsU19AI082714 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI GAFFNEY, PATRICK M · 2009 to 2018
$6.2M
Science in a Culture of MentoringP30GM103510 · NIGMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI JAMES, JUDITH A · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
Understanding early events in lupus autoimmunity to aid preventionU01AI101934 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI JAMES, JUDITH A · 2012 to 2016
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI101934NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082714NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR053483NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103510NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveMolecular medicine raised expectations for strategically targeted biologic agents in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but clinical trial results have been disappointing and difficult to interpret. Most studies add investigational agents to various, often effective, standard therapy immunosuppressants used at baseline, with unknown treatment interactions. Eliminating polypharmacy in trials of active lupus remains controversial. We undertook the Biomarkers of Lupus Disease study to test withdrawal of immunosuppressants as a novel approach to rendering SLE trials interpretable.

methodsIn 41 patients with active, non-organ-threatening SLE flare (group A), temporary steroids were given while background immunosuppressants were withdrawn. Time to loss of disease suppression (time to disease flare) and safety were evaluated; standard therapy was immediately resumed when symptoms recurred. Immunologic impacts of standard therapy were studied at baseline by multiplex assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and messenger RNA array in group A patients plus 62 additional patients donating a single sample (group B).

resultsPatients with lower or higher baseline disease activity had median times to flare of 71 or 45 days, respectively; 40 of 41 patients (98%) had disease flares by 6 months. All flares were treated and resolved within 6 weeks. No serious adverse events occurred from flare or infection. Type I interferon (IFN), Th17, and B lymphocyte stimulator pathways tracked together. Baseline immunosuppressants had distinct impacts on Th17 and B lymphocyte stimulator, depending on IFN signature.

conclusionTrials in active, non-organ-threatening SLE can safely withdraw background treatments if patients who have disease flares are designated nonresponders and returned to standard therapy. Immunologic effects of standard therapy vary between IFN-defined subsets. These findings provide a strategy for minimizing or optimizing treatment combinations in lupus trials and clinical care.

Indexed as

Withholding TreatmentAdultB-Cell Activating FactorBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon Type ILupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRNA, MessengerSteroidsSymptom Flare UpB-Cell Activating FactorBiomarkersImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon Type IRNA, MessengerSteroids

Identifiers

PMID28257602
PMCPMC5501389
OpenAlexW2592564537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.