Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28257420›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Effectiveness of a neuropsychological treatment for confabulations after brain injury: A clinical trial with theoretical implications.

Mónica Triviño, Estrella Ródenas, Juan Lupiáñez, Marisa Arnedo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03183453 (Replica Study of a Neuropsychological Treatment for Patients Who Show Spontaneous Confabulation After Acquired Brain Injury), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03183453 nacompletednot on this map

Replica Study of a Neuropsychological Treatment for Patients Who Show Spontaneous Confabulation After Acquired Brain Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorMonica Triviño MosqueraRan2015 to 2018Enrolled57ConditionsMemory DisordersArmsNeuropsychological treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mónica TriviñoDepartment of Neuropsychology. San Rafael University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Estrella RódenasMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center. University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Juan LupiáñezMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center. University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Marisa ArnedoMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center. University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESHospital Universitario San Rafael · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confabulators consistently generate false memories without intention to deceive and with great feelings of rightness. However, to our knowledge, there is currently no known effective treatment for them. In order to fill this gap, our aim was to design a neuropsychological treatment based on current theoretical models and test it experimentally in 20 confabulators sequentially allocated to two groups: an experimental and a control group. The experimental group received nine sessions of treatment for three weeks (three sessions per week). The sessions consisted of some brief material that participants had to learn and recall at both immediate and delayed time points. After this, patients were given feedback about their performance (errors and correct responses). Pre- and post-treatment measurements were recorded. Confabulators in the control group were included in a waiting list for three weeks, performed the pre- and post- measurements without treatment, and only then received the treatment, after which a post-treatment measurement was recorded. This applied to only half of the participants; the other half quit the study prematurely. Results showed a significant decrease in confabulations and a significant increase in correct responses in the experimental group; by contrast, patients in the control group did not improve during the waiting list period. Only control group patients who subsequently received the treatment after serving as controls improved. The effects of the treatment were generalized to patients' everyday lives, as reported by relatives, and persisted over time. This treatment seems to be effective and easy to implement and consequently of clinical interest. Moreover, it also has theoretical implications regarding the processes related to the genesis and/or maintenance of confabulations. In particular, results point to a deficit in early stages of memory retrieval with the preservation of later strategic monitoring processes. Specifically, some of the processes involved may include selective attention or early conflict detection deficits. Future research should test these hypotheses.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAttentionBrain InjuriesFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemoryMental RecallMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsNeuropsychologyStrokeTomography, Emission-Computed

Identifiers

PMID28257420
PMCPMC5336256
OpenAlexW2592684053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.