Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28257191›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2017

Chemical Space Mimicry for Drug Discovery.

William Yuan, Dadi Jiang, Dhanya K Nambiar, Lydia P Liew, Michael P Hay, Joshua Bloomstein, Peter Lu, Brandon Turner, Quynh-Thu Le, Robert Tibshirani and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Generative Deep Learning for de Novo Drug Design─A Chemical Space Odyssey.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Review
  7. CombiningRSC advances · 2024
    Article
  8. Designed with interactome-based deep learning.Nature chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exposing the Limitations of Molecular Machine Learning with Activity Cliffs.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Artificial Intelligence inCurrent topics in medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Review
  20. Deep Learning Applied to Ligand-Based De Novo Drug Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

William YuanTrinity College, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3BH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2682-0416
Dadi JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Dhanya K NambiarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Lydia P LiewAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand.
Michael P HayAuckland Cancer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland , Auckland, New Zealand.
Joshua BloomsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Peter LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Brandon TurnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Quynh-Thu LeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Robert TibshiraniDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Purvesh KhatriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Mark G MoloneyChemistry Research Laboratory, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3TA, United Kingdom.
Albert C KoongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California 94305, United States.

Funding

Using a tonsil organoid system to probe conditions for the induction of protective antibody and T cell responses to influenza.U19AI057229 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Morris Davis · 2003 to 2026
$88.5M
Translational Oncology Research Program (Project-005)P30CA124435 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Melinda L. Telli · 2007 to 2026
$71.4M
TUMOR HYPOXIA--MOLECULAR STUDIES &CLINICAL EXPLOITATIONP01CA067166 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LE, QUYNH-THU XUAN · 1996 to 2017
$25.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA067166NCI NIH HHS P30 CA124435NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe a new library generation method, Machine-based Identification of Molecules Inside Characterized Space (MIMICS), that generates sets of molecules inspired by a text-based input. MIMICS-generated libraries were found to preserve distributions of properties while simultaneously increasing structural diversity. Newly identified MIMICS-generated compounds were found to be bioactive as inhibitors of specific components of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and the VEGFR2 pathway in cell-based assays, thus confirming the applicability of this methodology toward drug design applications. Wider application of MIMICS could facilitate the efficient utilization of chemical space.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerDrug DiscoveryVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2

Identifiers

PMID28257191
PMCPMC5802964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.