Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28257104›Full record

ReviewGenes2017

The Role of the Transcriptional Response to DNA Replication Stress.

Anna E Herlihy, Robertus A M de Bruin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Cell cycle control in cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Cancer discovery · 2020
    Article
  7. The broken cycle: E2F dysfunction in cancer.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna E HerlihyMedical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. a.herlihy.12@ucl.ac.uk.
Robertus A M de BruinMedical Research Council Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK. r.debruin@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 20147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During DNA replication many factors can result in DNA replication stress. The DNA replication stress checkpoint prevents the accumulation of replication stress-induced DNA damage and the potential ensuing genome instability. A critical role for post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation, in the replication stress checkpoint response has been well established. However, recent work has revealed an important role for transcription in the cellular response to DNA replication stress. In this review, we will provide an overview of current knowledge of the cellular response to DNA replication stress with a specific focus on the DNA replication stress checkpoint transcriptional response and its role in the prevention of replication stress-induced DNA damage.

Indexed as

checkpoint responseChk1DNA replicationDNA replication stressE2F6E2F-dependent transcriptiononcogene-induced replication stress

Identifiers

PMID28257104
PMCPMC5368696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.