Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28256589›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Chemosensory adaptations of the mountain fly Drosophila nigrosparsa (Insecta: Diptera) through genomics' and structural biology's lenses.

Francesco Cicconardi, Daniele Di Marino, Pier Paolo Olimpieri, Wolfgang Arthofer, Birgit C Schlick-Steiner, Florian M Steiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Transcriptome analysis ofEcology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  9. Ecology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  10. The Structure and Function of Ionotropic Receptors inFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco CicconardiInstitute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Daniele Di MarinoDepartment of Informatics, Institute of Computational Science, University of Italian Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland.
Pier Paolo OlimpieriDepartment of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Wolfgang ArthoferInstitute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Birgit C Schlick-SteinerInstitute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Florian M SteinerInstitute of Ecology, University of Innsbruck, Technikerstr. 25, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoreception is essential for survival. Some chemicals signal the presence of nutrients or toxins, others the proximity of mating partners, competitors, or predators. Chemical signal transduction has therefore been studied in multiple organisms. In Drosophila species, a number of odorant receptor genes and various other types of chemoreceptors were found. Three main gene families encode for membrane receptors and one for globular proteins that shuttle compounds with different degrees of affinity and specificity towards receptors. By sequencing the genome of Drosophila nigrosparsa, a habitat specialist restricted to montane/alpine environment, and combining genomics and structural biology techniques, we characterised odorant, gustatory, ionotropic receptors and odorant binding proteins, annotating 189 loci and modelling the protein structure of two ionotropic receptors and one odorant binding protein. We hypothesise that the D. nigrosparsa genome experienced gene loss and various evolutionary pressures (diversifying positive selection, relaxation, and pseudogenisation), as well as structural modification in the geometry and electrostatic potential of the two ionotropic receptor binding sites. We discuss possible trajectories in chemosensory adaptation processes, possibly enhancing compound affinity and mediating the evolution of more specialized food, and a fine-tuned mechanism of adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGenomic LibraryGenomicsModels, MolecularMultigene FamilyPhylogenyProtein ConformationReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, OdorantSequence Analysis, DNADrosophila Proteinsgustatory receptor, Drosophilaodorant-binding proteinReceptors, Cell SurfaceReceptors, Ionotropic GlutamateReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID28256589
PMCPMC5335605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.