Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28256524›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Limitations and challenges of genetic barcode quantification.

Lars Thielecke, Tim Aranyossy, Andreas Dahl, Rajiv Tiwari, Ingo Roeder, Hartmut Geiger, Boris Fehse, Ingmar Glauche, Kerstin Cornils

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Interrogation of clonal tracking data usingNature computational science · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lars ThieleckeInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Tim AranyossyResearch Dept. Cell and Gene Therapy, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas DahlDeep Sequencing Group SFB 655, Biotechnology Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Rajiv TiwariInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Stem Cell Aging, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11c, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Ingo RoederInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Hartmut GeigerInstitute of Molecular Medicine and Stem Cell Aging, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11c, D-89081 Ulm, Germany.
Boris FehseResearch Dept. Cell and Gene Therapy, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Ingmar GlaucheInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Kerstin CornilsResearch Dept. Cell and Gene Therapy, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

Lineage Determination and Tissue HomeOstasis in the aged Hematopoietic SystemR01AG040118 · NIA · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI GEIGER, HARTMUT, ZHENG, YI · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG040118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic barcodes are increasingly used to track individual cells and to quantitatively assess their clonal contributions over time. Although barcode quantification relies entirely on counting sequencing reads, detailed studies about the method's accuracy are still limited. We report on a systematic investigation of the relation between barcode abundance and resulting read counts after amplification and sequencing using cell-mixtures that contain barcodes with known frequencies ("miniBulks"). We evaluated the influence of protocol modifications to identify potential sources of error and elucidate possible limitations of the quantification approach. Based on these findings we designed an advanced barcode construct (BC32) to improved barcode calling and quantification, and to ensure a sensitive detection of even highly diluted barcodes. Our results emphasize the importance of using curated barcode libraries to obtain interpretable quantitative data and underline the need for rigorous analyses of any utilized barcode library in terms of reliability and reproducibility.

Indexed as

Cell CountDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHEK293 CellsHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID28256524
PMCPMC5335698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.