Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28256517›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Word meaning acquisition is reflected in brain potentials of isolated words.

Jan Rouke Kuipers, Anastasia Uminski, Zoe Green, David Hughes, Tommaso Aglietti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jan Rouke KuipersPsychology Division, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, FK9 4LA Stirling, United Kingdom.
Anastasia UminskiPsychology Division, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, FK9 4LA Stirling, United Kingdom.
Zoe GreenPsychology Division, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, FK9 4LA Stirling, United Kingdom.
David HughesPsychology Division, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, FK9 4LA Stirling, United Kingdom.
Tommaso AgliettiPsychology Division, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Stirling University, FK9 4LA Stirling, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning a new concept and corresponding word typically involves repeated exposure to the word in the same or a similar context until the link crystallizes in long term memory. Although electrophysiological indices of the result of learning are well documented, there is currently no measure of the process of conceptually-mediated learning itself. Here, we recorded event-related brain potentials from participants who read unfamiliar words presented in isolation followed by a definition that either explained the meaning of the word or was a true, but uninformative statement. Self-reported word knowledge ratings increased for those words that were followed by meaningful definitions and were correlated with a decrease in ERP amplitude of a late frontal negativity (LFN) elicited by the isolated word. Importantly, the rate of LFN amplitude change predicted post-hoc learning outcome measures. Therefore, the LFN is real-time measure that is not under conscious control and which reflects conceptually-mediated learning. We propose that the LFN provides for the first time the opportunity to assess learning during study.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainBrain MappingEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMemoryReadingSemanticsVerbal LearningYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28256517
PMCPMC5335672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.