ArticleBiophysical journal2017
Design Rules for Membrane-Embedded Voltage-Sensing Nanoparticles.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Coherent heteroepitaxial growth of I-III-VINature communications · 2023Article
- Optoelectronic Neural Interfaces Based on Quantum Dots.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Review
- Time for NanoNeuro.Nature methods · 2021Review
- Quantum Dots: An Emerging Tool for Point-of-Care Testing.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Electrical Control ofBioelectricity · 2020Article
- All-Optical Detection of Neuronal Membrane Depolarization in Live Cells Using Colloidal Quantum Dots.Nano letters · 2019Article
- Rapid Voltage Sensing with Single Nanorods via the Quantum Confined Stark Effect.ACS photonics · 2018Article
- Evaluating the potential of using quantum dots for monitoring electrical signals in neurons.Nature nanotechnology · 2018Review
- Membrane insertion of-and membrane potential sensing by-semiconductor voltage nanosensors: Feasibility demonstration.Science advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voltage-sensing dyes and voltage-sensing fluorescence proteins have been continually improved and as a result have provided a wealth of insights into neuronal circuits. Further improvements in voltage-sensing dyes and voltage-sensing fluorescence proteins are needed, however, for routine detection of single action potentials across a large number of individual neurons in a large field-of-view of a live mammalian brain. On the other hand, recent experiments and calculations suggest that semiconducting nanoparticles could act as efficient voltage sensors, suitable for the above-mentioned task. This study presents quantum mechanical calculations, including Auger recombination rates, of the quantum-confined Stark effect in membrane-embedded semiconducting nanoparticles, examines their possible utility as membrane voltage sensors, and provide design rules for their structure and composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.