Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28256227›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Direction- and Salt-Dependent Ionic Current Signatures for DNA Sensing with Asymmetric Nanopores.

Kaikai Chen, Nicholas A W Bell, Jinglin Kong, Yu Tian, Ulrich F Keyser

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Fabrication and Characterization of Glass Nanopores.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Engineering a Monomeric Nanopore Scaffold for Multiplexed Protein Detection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Detecting DNA translocation through a nanopore using a van der Waals heterojunction diode.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Single-Molecule Binding Assay Using Nanopores and Dimeric NP Conjugates.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kaikai ChenCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; State Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Nicholas A W BellCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Jinglin KongCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Yu TianState Key Laboratory of Tribology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ulrich F KeyserCavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Electronic address: ufk20@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state nanopores are promising tools for single-molecule detection of both DNA and proteins. In this study, we investigated the patterns of ionic current blockades as DNA translocates into or out of the geometric confinement of conically shaped pores across a wide range of salt conditions. We studied how the geometry of a nanopore affects the detected ionic current signal of a translocating DNA molecule over a wide range of salt concentration. The blockade level in the ionic current depends on the translocation direction at a high salt concentration, and at lower salt concentrations we find a nonintuitive ionic current decrease and increase within each single event for the DNA translocations exiting from confinement. We use a recently developed method for synthesizing DNA molecules with multiple position markers, which provides further experimental characterization by matching the position of the DNA in the pore with the observed ionic current signal. Finally, we employ finite element calculations to explain the shapes of the signals observed at all salt concentrations and show that the unexpected current decrease and increase are due to the competing effects of ion concentration polarization and geometric exclusion of ions. Our analysis shows that over a wide range of geometries, voltages, and salt concentrations, we are able to understand the ionic current signals of DNA in asymmetric nanopores, enabling signal optimization in molecular sensing applications.

Indexed as

MovementNanoporesNanotechnologyDNADose-Response Relationship, DrugFinite Element AnalysisGlassSaltsDNASalts

Identifiers

PMID28256227
PMCPMC5340120
OpenAlexW2569423563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.