Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28256220›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Do All X-ray Structures of Protein-Ligand Complexes Represent Functional States? EPOR, a Case Study.

Michael S P Corbett, Alan E Mark, David Poger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael S P CorbettSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Alan E MarkSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: a.e.mark@uq.edu.au.
David PogerSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on differences between the x-ray crystal structures of ligand-bound and unbound forms, the activation of the erythropoietin receptor (EPOR) was initially proposed to involve a cross-action scissorlike motion. However, the validity of the motions involved in the scissorlike model has been recently challenged. Here, atomistic molecular dynamics simulations are used to examine the structure of the extracellular domain of the EPOR dimer in the presence and absence of erythropoietin and a series of agonistic or antagonistic mimetic peptides free in solution. The simulations suggest that in the absence of crystal packing effects, the EPOR chains in the different dimers adopt very similar conformations with no clear distinction between the agonist and antagonist-bound complexes. This questions whether the available x-ray crystal structures of EPOR truly represent active or inactive conformations. The study demonstrates the difficulty in using such structures to infer a mechanism of action, especially in the case of membrane receptors where just part of the structure has been considered in addition to potential confounding effects that arise from the comparison of structures in a crystal as opposed to a membrane environment. The work highlights the danger of assigning functional significance to small differences between structures of proteins bound to different ligands in a crystal environment without consideration of the effects of the crystal lattice and thermal motion.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceApoproteinsCrystallography, X-RayLigandsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, QuaternaryReceptors, ErythropoietinApoproteinsLigandsReceptors, Erythropoietin

Identifiers

PMID28256220
PMCPMC5340159
OpenAlexW2591801848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.