Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28255958›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular neuroscience : MN2017

Cognitive Functions: Human vs. Animal - 4:1 Advantage |-FAM72-SRGAP2-|.

Nguyen Thi Thanh Ho, Pok-Son Kim, Arne Kutzner, Klaus Heese

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nguyen Thi Thanh HoGraduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimniro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-791, Republic of Korea.
Pok-Son KimDepartment of Mathematics, Kookmin University, 77 Jeongneung-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 136-702, Republic of Korea.
Arne KutznerDepartment of Information Systems, College of Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimni-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-791, Republic of Korea.
Klaus HeeseGraduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, 222 Wangsimniro, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, 133-791, Republic of Korea. klaus@hanyang.ac.kr.
Hanyang University · KRAnyang University · KRKookmin University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of computational genomics, an intensive search is underway for unique biomarkers for Homo sapiens that could be used to differentiate taxa within the Hominoidea, in particular to distinguish Homo from the apes (Pan, Gorilla, Pongo, and Hylobates) and species or subspecies within the genus Homo (H. sapiens, H. heidelbergensis, H. neanderthalensis, H. erectus, and the Denisovans). Here, we suggest that the |-FAM72-SRGAP2-| (family with sequence similarity 72/SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 2) gene pair is a unique molecular biomarker for the genus Homo that could also help to place Australopithecus at its most appropriate place within the phylogenetic tree and may explain the distinctive higher brain cognitive functions of humans.

Indexed as

CognitionEvolution, MolecularAnimalsGenetic MarkersGTPase-Activating ProteinsHominidaeHumansPhylogenyGenetic MarkersGTPase-Activating ProteinsSRGAP2 protein, humanApeBrainEvolutionHomoNeuronPhylogenetic treeSynapseTaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID28255958
OpenAlexW2592941686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.