ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2017
Erratum to: What Differences in Morphologic Features of the Knee Exist Among Patients of Various Races? A Systematic Review.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04355182 (Is Standard 3-degree of External Rotation for Posterior Femoral Cut Relevant for Turkish Population), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Is Standard 3-degree of External Rotation for Posterior Femoral Cut Relevant for Turkish Population: An Anthropometric MRI Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distal femur morphology and the suitability of standard guides for knee arthroplasty in the Turkish population.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.