Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28255923›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2017

Transmission differentials for multiple pathogens as inferred from their prevalence in larva, nymph and adult of Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae).

Per M Jensen, Christian S Christoffersen, Sara Moutailler, Lorraine Michelet, Kirstine Klitgaard, Rene Bødker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The raccoon dog (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiple Tick-Borne Pathogens inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Per M JensenDepartment for Plant and Environment, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark. pmj@plen.ku.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-7711
Christian S ChristoffersenDepartment for Plant and Environment, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Sara MoutaillerUMR BIPAR, ANSES, INRA, ENVA, 14 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94706, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, Paris, France.
Lorraine MicheletUMR BIPAR, ANSES, INRA, ENVA, 14 Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94706, Maisons-Alfort Cedex, Paris, France.
Kirstine KlitgaardNational Veterinary Institute, Danish Technical University, Bülowsvej 27, 1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Rene BødkerNational Veterinary Institute, Danish Technical University, Bülowsvej 27, 1871, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort · FRTechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ixodes ricinus serves as vector for a range of microorganisms capable of causing clinical illness in humans. The microorganisms occur in the same vector populations and are generally affected by the same tick-host interactions. Still, the instars have different host preferences which should manifest in different transmission patterns for various microorganisms in the tick populations, i.e., most microorganisms increase in prevalence rate from larvae to nymphs because their reservoirs are among small mammals and birds that serve as blood hosts for larvae. Other microorganisms, like Anaplasma phagocytophilum, mainly increase in prevalence rates from nymphs to adults, because their reservoirs are larger ungulates that serve as primary blood hosts for nymphs and adults. We sampled a representative sample of ticks from 12 locations on Zealand and Funen, Denmark, and investigated the differences in prevalence rate of infection in larvae, nymphs and adults for multiple pathogens. Prevalence of infection for larvae, nymphs and adults, respectively, was: 0, 1.5 and 4.5% for Borrelia burgdorferi; 0, 4.2 and 3.9% for Borrelia garinii; 0, 6.6 and 6.1% for Borrelia afzelii; 0, 0 and 0.6% for Borrelia valaisiana; 0, 3.7 and 0.6% for Borrelia spielmanii; 0, 0.7 and 1.2% for Babesia divergens; 0, 0, 0.6% for Babesia venatorum; 0, 1.5 and 6.1% for A. phagocytophilum. The results were in general compatible with the hypothesis i.e., that differences in blood host for larvae and nymphs define differences in transmission of infectious agents, but other factors than differences in blood hosts between larvae and nymphs may also be important to consider.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesAnimalsDenmarkHumansIxodesLarvaNymphPrevalenceTick-Borne DiseasesAnaplasmaBabesiaBorreliaIxodes ricinusPrevalenceRickettsiaTransmission

Identifiers

PMID28255923
OpenAlexW2593415732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.